Publications

Detailed Information

기하학적 질서에 따라 증명된 思學의 四端之情과 不思不學의 七者之情

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors

성동권

Publisher
서울대학교 규장각한국학연구원
Citation
한국문화, Vol.94 No., pp. 441-467
Keywords
퇴계성학십도성학방법사여학(思與學)불사불학(不思不學)
하학적 질서
사단칠정리발이기수지기발이리승지정리(情理)정기(情氣)성리학(性理學)정리학(情理學)Ten Diagrams on Sage Learningthe four feelings(四端)the seven
feelings(七情)
geometric orderLival-i-Kisuji(理發而氣隨之)Kival-i-
Lisengji(氣發而理乘之)
thinking(思)learning(學)the necessity of
feelings’ own nature(情理)
feelings(情氣)the science of feelings(情理學)
Abstract
On the basis of Toegyes presentation address in the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning,
this paper discovered that the method of sage learning is thinking(思) and learning
(學). Thinking is the clear and distinct understand on the necessity of nature itself, i.e
Li(理). Learning is the execution of the necessity of nature itself conceived by thinking.
Since Toegye had summarized the method for the sage learning this paper analyzed
whether the four feelings and the seven feelings, representing Toegyes sage learning,
matched this method. To this end, this paper established 10 definitions and 1 axiom
based on Toegyes writings, and deduced 10 theorems deduced from them as the
necessity of geometric order.
As a result, it is proved that the four feelings defined as Lival-i-Kisuji(理發而氣隨
之) is coherent with the method of sage learning. Lival(理發) is the clear thinking
and learning of Li. However, fundamentally different from the four feelings, the seven
feelings defined as Kival-i-Lisengji(氣發而理乘之) proved to be contrary to the method
of sage learning. Kival(氣發) is not the clear thinking and learning of Li. Therefore it
is certain that the four feelings in Toegyes sage learning is thinking and learning but
the seven feelings is not thinking and learning.
Based on these geometric conclusions, this paper understands the theory for the four
feelings and the seven feelings epitomized by Toegyes sage learning as the feelings
epistemology. That is why the four feelings and the seven feelings epitomized by
Toegyes sage learning cannot be explained by feelings(四端) that are morally good and
feelings(七情) that are not morally determined. Furthermore, there is no distinction
between ideal(四端) and realistic(七情) feelings.
According to the conclusion of this article, all feelings exist in the necessity of Li-Ki
(理-氣) causality. In this necessity of Li-Ki(理-氣) causality, all feelings(情氣) exist with
their own Li(情理) as the necessity of their own nature, and exist only according to the
necessity of that nature. This way of understanding on feelings based on thinking and
learning was encapsulated into Lival-i-Kisuji(理發而氣隨之) by Toegye. In so far as
we think and learn all feelings with this method all feelings are perfect and good in
itself. Therefore it is the four feelings that thinks and learns all feelings by the method
for the sage learning, but it is the seven feelings that does not think and learn all
feelings in that manner.
As thinking and learning about feelings, the core of the four feelings is, above all,
clearly and distinctly recognizing the necessity of feelings in the Li-Ki (理-氣) causality.
All feelings(情氣) inherently have the necessity of one's own nature(情理), which exists
only according to this nature. Based on the Li(理)-Ki(氣) necessity of feelings, this
article defines Toegyes four feelings(四端) as the science of feelings, i.e 情理學.
Therefore, the truth of feelings, from eternity to eternity, is originally the four feelings
explained by Lival-i-Kisuji(理發而氣隨之).
ISSN
1226-8356
Language
Korean
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/180148
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share