南塘 韓元震의 ｢題寒泉詩後｣에 대한 泉門의 대응 (1): 崔祏의 「泉門俟百錄」을 중심으로

Abstract

Ho-Rak Controversy(湖洛論爭) can be considered to have been formed and developed through four stages. The Controversy as a debate between the Hohak(湖學) school and Rakhak(洛學) school, rather than as a debate about related topics such as the uniqueness of Human Nature contrasting Animal Nature, and the uniqueness of the sages mind-heart contrasting the commoners, can be seen to have actually started in the 3rd period. In the 3rd period, the main protagonists of the debate were Doam(陶菴) Yi Jae(李縡: 1680-1746) and his disciples on the one side of Rakhak, and Namdang(南塘) Han Won-jin(韓元震: 1682-1751) and Byunggye(屛溪) Yun Bong-gu(尹鳳九: 1681-1767) and their disciples on the other side of Ho-hak. Especially Choi Seok(崔祏: 1714-?) played a major role in the start of the 3rd period. As a disciple of Li Jae, he visited Han Won-jin in 1746 with the goal of reconciling the differences between the two camps and returning to unification. After his visit he reported to his master Yi Jae and Yi wrote the poem, Hancheonsi (寒泉詩), and responding to it Han Wrote the epilogue of it, JeHancheonsihu(題寒泉詩 後) and a letter Useo(又書) to criticize the views of Yi and Choi. When Han Won-jin wrote the articles, Yi Jae had already passed away, and the response to it became an task of his disciples, that is, Cheonmun(泉門). And In the process of it, the Ho-Rak Controversy developed in earnest as a confrontation between Hohak school and Nakhak school. It has had the character of competition over an academic orthodoxy and at the same time of a political hegemony struggle within the Roron(老論) Party. This thesis summarizes the facts related to Choi Seoks visit to Han Won-jin and fundamentally analyzes the Cheonsabaekrok(泉門俟百錄) by Choi, which developed a critical response of Han Won-jins criticism against Yi Jae.