Publications

Detailed Information

The effect of nafamostat mesilate infusion after ERCP for post-ERCP pancreatitis

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Joo Seong-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sang Hyub-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Namyoung-
dc.contributor.authorHuh, Gunn-
dc.contributor.authorChun, Jung Won-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Jin Ho-
dc.contributor.authorCho, In Rae-
dc.contributor.authorPaik, Woo Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorRyu, Ji Kon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yong-Tae-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-11T00:45:44Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-11T00:45:44Z-
dc.date.created2022-06-15-
dc.date.issued2022-05-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Gastroenterology, Vol.22 No.1, p. 271-
dc.identifier.issn1471-230X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/185676-
dc.description.abstractBackground Nafamostat mesilate decreases the incidence of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, no studies have administered nafamostat mesilate after ERCP. So we investigated if the infusion of nafamostat mesilate after ERCP can affect the post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in high-risk patients. Methods In a tertiary hospital, 350 high-risk patients of PEP were reviewed retrospectively. Among them, 201 patients received nafamostat mesilate after ERCP. Patient-related and procedure-related risk factors for PEP were collected. We performed a propensity score matching to adjust for the significant different baseline characteristics. The incidence and severity of PEP were evaluated according to the infusion of nafamostat mesilate. The risk factors of PEP were also analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. Results The baseline characteristics were not different after the matching. The PEP rate (17.4% vs. 10.3%, P = 0.141) was insignificant. Among the PEP patients, mild PEP was significantly higher in the nafamostat mesilate group (85.7% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.021). Only one patient in the nafamostat mesilate group developed severe PEP. Although young age (odds ratio [OR] 3.60, 95% CI 1.09-11.85, P = 0.035) was a risk factor, nafamostat mesilate (odds ratio [OR] 0.30, 95% CI 0.09-0.98, P = 0.047) was a protective factor for moderate to severe PEP. Conclusions The administration of nafamostat mesilate after ERCP in high-risk patients was not effective in preventing PEP, but may attenuate the severity of PEP.-
dc.language영어-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.titleThe effect of nafamostat mesilate infusion after ERCP for post-ERCP pancreatitis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12876-022-02345-3-
dc.citation.journaltitleBMC Gastroenterology-
dc.identifier.wosid000803901300002-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85130990214-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startpage271-
dc.citation.volume22-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorCho, In Rae-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorRyu, Ji Kon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Yong-Tae-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share