Publications

Detailed Information

Improved prognosis with integrated care management including early rhythm control and healthy lifestyle modification in patients with concurrent atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus: a nationwide cohort study

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors

So‑Ryoung Lee; Hyo‑Jeong Ahn; Eue‑Keun Choi; Seung‑Woo Lee; Kyung‑Do Han; Seil Oh; Gregory Y. H. Lip

Issue Date
2023-01-30
Publisher
BMC
Citation
Cardiovascular Diabetology, 22(1):18
Keywords
Early rhythm controlLifestyle modificationAtrial fibrillationDiabetes mellitus
Abstract
Background
Patients with concurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) [AF-DM] have a high risk of cardiovascular and diabetes-related complications, but are less engaged in a comprehensive treatment approach. We evaluated the association of early rhythm control (ERC), lifestyle modification (LSM), and a combination of ERC and LSM with cardiovascular or diabetes-related complication risk in patients with AF-DM (type 2).
Methods
From the National Health Information Database, 47,940 patients diagnosed with AF-DM in 2009–2016 were included. We defined ERC as rhythm control therapy within two years of AF diagnosis and LSM as adherence to ≥ 2 of the healthy behaviors among non-current smoking, non-drinking, and regular exercise. We compared the primary (ischemic stroke) and secondary (macro- and microvascular complications, glycemic emergency, and all-cause death) outcomes in four groups: non-ERC and non-LSM (group 1), LSM only (group 2), ERC only (group 3), and both ERC and LSM (group 4).
Results
Of total, 10,617 (22%), 26,730 (55.8%), 2,903 (6.1%), and 7,690 (16.0%) were classified into groups 1 to 4, in sequence. The mean duration from AF diagnosis to ERC was 25.6 ± 75.5days. During 4.0 (interquartile range: 2.5–6.2) years follow-up, groups 2 and 3 were associated with 23% and 33% lower risks of stroke than group 1, respectively. Group 4 was associated with the lowest risk of stroke: hazard ratio (HR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51–0.67, p < 0.001. Regarding secondary outcomes, the lowest risks were also observed in group 4; macro- and microvascular complications, glycemic emergency, and all-cause death had HRs (95% CIs) of 0.63 (0.56–0.70), 0.88 (0.82–0.94), 0.72 (0.62–0.84), and 0.80 (0.73–0.87), respectively, all p < 0.001.
Conclusions
For AF-DM patients, ERC and LSM exert a synergistic effect in preventing cardiovascular and diabetes-related complications with the greatest lowered risk of stroke. A comprehensive treatment approach should be pursued in AF-DM patients.
Language
English
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/189112
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-01749-z
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share