Publications

Detailed Information

A Comparative Study of the Integration of Sustainability in the Lower Secondary Science Curriculum of Sweden and South Korea : 중학교 과학과 교육과정에서의 지속가능성 내용에 대한 스웨덴과 한국의 국제비교연구

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisorSonya Nichole Martin-
dc.contributor.author노정민-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-29T02:19:43Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-29T02:19:43Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.other000000176221-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/193891-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dcollection.snu.ac.kr/common/orgView/000000176221ko_KR
dc.description학위논문(석사) -- 서울대학교대학원 : 사범대학 협동과정 환경교육전공, 2023. 2. Sonya Nichole Martin.-
dc.description.abstractThis research examines how sustainability is integrated in science curricula for Sweden and Korea. At this time, increasingly recurrent extreme weather events have wreaked havoc on peoples lives and sustainability of the planet. Sustainability has become an important issue within the education field. Analysis of curriculum could offer an understanding of various social aspects, and science education has gradually incorporated social issues in its curriculum.
The analyses were guided by the basic content analysis of learning content in both curricula, and the interpretive content analysis in the light of four aspects of the curricula: presence of sustainability, views of the student, human-environment relationship and philosophical/theoretical underpinnings. The integration of sustainability in learning content of the curriculum was significantly higher in the Swedish science curriculum than the Korean one. As for sustainability presence, the Swedish curriculum adopted more explicit languages than the Korean curriculum. And both curricula viewed the student as an agentic individual with focusing on competencies for sustainability. With regard to human-environment relationship, the Swedish curriculum stated reciprocal relationships between human and nature, while the Korean curriculum showed a more anthropocentric view. Both curricula mainly embodied sociocultural and human-centered views of learning when it comes to philosophical and theoretical underpinnings. There is a need to consider a more sustainability integrated science curriculum framework with enough knowledge, descriptions of students as active agents, thought-provoking with regard to human-environment relationships, and the establishment of philosophical basis and theories underpinning sustainability.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter 1. Introduction 1
1.1. The Background of the Study 1
1.2. Purpose of Study / Research Questions 6
1.3. Significance of the Current Study 7
Chapter 2. Literature Review 8
2.1. Integration of Sustainability in Education 8
2.1.1. Finding the Root of Sustainability 9
2.1.2. Emergence of Sustainability / Sustainable Development, and Education for
Sustainable Development (ESD) 11
2.1.3. UNDESD: Global Initiatives to Promote ESD 13
2.1.4. Criticisms and Challenges over ESD 15
2.1.5. The Future of Sustainability Education 16
2.2. Sustainability Curriculum and Policy in each Country 17
2.2.1. Sweden 17
2.2.1.1. Socio-cultural and Political Tendencies 17
2.2.1.2. Integration of Sustainability in School Education 19
2.2.2. South Korea 20
2.2.2.1. Socio-cultural and Political Tendencies 20
2.2.2.2. Integration of Sustainability in School Education 21
2.3. Comparative and International Education 23
2.3.1. Overview 23
2.3.2. General Comparative Inquiry 24
2.3.3. Difficulties and Challenges 25
2.4. Framework for Interpretive Analysis of Sustainability in Curricula 27
Chapter 3. Methodology 30
3.1. Research Design and Overview 30
3.2. Content Analysis 32
3.3. Data Sources 33
3.3.1. Swedish National Science Curriculum 33
3.3.2. Korean National Science Curriculum 36
3.4. Data Analysis 38
3.4.1. Rubric for the Basic Content Analysis 39
3.4.2. Rubric for the Interpretive Content Analysis 44
3.5. Reliability and Validity 45
Chapter 4. Results and Discussions 47
4.1. Basic Content Analysis of Sustainability in Both Curricula 47
4.2. Interpretive Content Analysis of Sustainability in Both Curricula 54
4.2.1. Presence of Sustainability 54
4.2.2. View of the Student 56
4.2.3. Human-Environment Relationship 57
4.2.4. Philosophical / Theoretical Underpinnings 59
Chapter 5. Conclusions and Implications 61
5.1. Conclusions 61
5.2. Implications 66
5.3. Limitations of Study 69
Chapter 6. Bibliography 71
Appendix 96
-
dc.format.extent100-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectSustainability-
dc.subjectScience curriculum-
dc.subjectEducation for Sustainable Development (ESD)-
dc.subjectSweden-
dc.subjectSouth Korea-
dc.subjectInternational comparative research-
dc.subject.ddc363.7007-
dc.titleA Comparative Study of the Integration of Sustainability in the Lower Secondary Science Curriculum of Sweden and South Korea-
dc.title.alternative중학교 과학과 교육과정에서의 지속가능성 내용에 대한 스웨덴과 한국의 국제비교연구-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.typeDissertation-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorJeongmin Noh-
dc.contributor.department사범대학 협동과정 환경교육전공-
dc.description.degree석사-
dc.date.awarded2023-02-
dc.identifier.uciI804:11032-000000176221-
dc.identifier.holdings000000000049▲000000000056▲000000176221▲-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share