Publications

Detailed Information

Optimum diameter threshold for lung nodules at baseline lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT: exploration of results from the Korean Lung Cancer Screening Project

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Eui Jin-
dc.contributor.authorGoo, Jin Mo-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyae Young-
dc.contributor.authorYi, Jaeyoun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yeol-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-03T06:42:17Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-03T06:42:17Z-
dc.date.created2021-09-24-
dc.date.created2021-09-24-
dc.date.created2021-09-24-
dc.date.created2021-09-24-
dc.date.created2021-09-24-
dc.date.issued2021-09-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Radiology, Vol.31 No.9, pp.7202-7212-
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/194631-
dc.description.abstractObjectives To explore the optimum diameter threshold for solid nodules to define positive results at baseline screening low-dose CT (LDCT) and to compare two-dimensional and volumetric measurement of lung nodules for the diagnosis of lung cancers. Methods We included consecutive participants from the Korean Lung Cancer Screening project between 2017 and 2018. The average transverse diameter and effective diameter (diameter of a sphere with the same volume) of lung nodules were measured by semi-automated segmentation. Diagnostic performances for lung cancers diagnosed within 1 year after LDCT were evaluated using area under receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUCs), sensitivities, and specificities, with diameter thresholds for solid nodules ranging from 6 to 10 mm. The reduction of unnecessary follow-up LDCTs and the diagnostic delay of lung cancers were estimated for each threshold. Results Fifty-two lung cancers were diagnosed among 10,424 (10,141 men; median age 62 years) participants within 1 year after LDCT. Average transverse (0.980) and effective diameters (0.981) showed similar AUCs (p = .739). Elevating the average transverse diameter threshold from 6 to 9 mm resulted in a significantly increased specificity (91.7 to 96.7%, p < .001), a modest reduction in sensitivity (96.2 to 94.2%, p = .317), a 60.2% estimated reduction of unnecessary follow-up LDCTs, and a diagnostic delay in 1.9% of lung cancers. Elevating the threshold to 10 mm led to a significant reduction in sensitivity (86.5%, p = .025). Conclusions Elevating the diameter threshold for solid nodules from 6 to 9 mm may lead to a substantial reduction in unnecessary follow-up LDCTs with a small proportion of diagnostic delay of lung cancers.-
dc.language영어-
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag-
dc.titleOptimum diameter threshold for lung nodules at baseline lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT: exploration of results from the Korean Lung Cancer Screening Project-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-021-07827-8-
dc.citation.journaltitleEuropean Radiology-
dc.identifier.wosid000630283200004-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85103038646-
dc.citation.endpage7212-
dc.citation.number9-
dc.citation.startpage7202-
dc.citation.volume31-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorGoo, Jin Mo-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorLung neoplasms-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEarly detection of cancer-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorTomography-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorX-ray computed-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSensitivity-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSpecificity-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share