Publications

Detailed Information

The relationship between the effect-site concentration of propofol and sedation scale in children: a pharmacodynamic modeling study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorJang, Young-Eun-
dc.contributor.authorJi, Sang-Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Ji-Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Eun-Hee-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jin-Tae-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hee-Soo-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T00:42:38Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-11T00:42:38Z-
dc.date.created2021-09-28-
dc.date.issued2021-09-09-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Anesthesiology, Vol.21 No.1, p. 222-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2253-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/197701-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Continuous infusion of propofol has been used to achieve sedation in children. However, the relationship between the effect-site concentration (C-e) of propofol and sedation scale has not been previously examined. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the C-e of propofol and the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) score in children with population pharmacodynamic modeling. Methods: A total of 30 patients (aged 3 to 6 years) who underwent surgery under general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil lasting more than 1 h were enrolled in this study. Sedation levels were evaluated using the UMSS score every 20 s by a 1 mu g/mL stepwise increase in the C-e of propofol during the induction of anesthesia. The pharmacodynamic relationship between the C-e of propofol and UMSS score was analyzed by logistic regression with nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. Results: The estimated C-e50 (95% confidence interval) of propofol to yield UMSS scores equal to or greater than n were 1.84 (1.54-2.14), 2.64 (2.20-3.08), 3.98 (3.66-4.30), and 4.78 (4.53-5.03) mu g/mL for n = 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The slope steepness for the relationship of the C-e versus sedative response to propofol (95% confidence interval) was 5.76 (4.00-7.52). Conclusions: We quantified the pharmacodynamic relationship between the C-e of propofol and UMSS score, and this finding may be helpful to predict the sedation score at the target C-e of propofol in children.-
dc.language영어-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.titleThe relationship between the effect-site concentration of propofol and sedation scale in children: a pharmacodynamic modeling study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12871-021-01446-y-
dc.citation.journaltitleBMC Anesthesiology-
dc.identifier.wosid000694880500001-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85114701739-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startpage222-
dc.citation.volume21-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Jin-Tae-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Hee-Soo-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTARGET-CONTROLLED INFUSION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPROCEDURAL SEDATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPHARMACOKINETICS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPAEDFUSOR-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSAFETY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDEPTH-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAnesthesia-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAnesthetics-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPharmacodynamics-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPharmacokinetics-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSedation-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share