Publications

Detailed Information

Differential patterns of reproductive and lifestyle risk factors for breast cancer according to birth cohorts among women in China, Japan and Korea

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors

Salma Nabila; Choi Ji‑Yeob; Sarah Krull Abe; Md Rashedul Islam; Md Shafur Rahman; Eiko Saito; Aesun Shin; Melissa A. Merritt; Ryoko Katagiri; Xiao‑Ou Shu; Norie Sawada; Akiko Tamakoshi; Ritsu Sakata; Atsushi Hozawa; Kim Jeongseon; Chisato Nagata; Park Sue K.; Kweon Sun‑Seog; Hui Cai; Shoichiro Tsugane; Takashi Kimura; Seiki Kanemura; Yumi Sugawara; Keiko Wada; Shin Min‑Ho; Habibul Ahsan; Paolo Bofetta; Kee Seng Chia; Keitaro Matsuo; You‑Lin Qiao; Nathaniel Rothman; Wei Zheng; Manami Inoue; Kang Daehee

Issue Date
2024-01-22
Publisher
BMC
Citation
Breast Cancer Research, Vol.26, no.15
Keywords
Breast cancerBirth cohortReproductive factorsLifestyle factorsWomenAsiaBackground
Abstract
Background
The birth cohort effect has been suggested to influence the rate of breast cancer incidence and the trends of associated reproductive and lifestyle factors. We conducted a cohort study to determine whether a differential pattern of associations exists between certain factors and breast cancer risk based on birth cohorts.

Methods
This was a cohort study using pooled data from 12 cohort studies. We analysed associations between reproductive (menarche age, menopause age, parity and age at first delivery) and lifestyle (smoking and alcohol consumption) factors and breast cancer risk. We obtained hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis on the 1920s, 1930s, 1940s and 1950s birth cohorts.

Results
Parity was found to lower the risk of breast cancer in the older but not in the younger birth cohort, whereas lifestyle factors showed associations with breast cancer risk only among the participants born in the 1950s. In the younger birth cohort group, the effect size was lower for parous women compared to the other cohort groups (HR [95% CI] 0.86 [0.66–1.13] compared to 0.60 [0.49–0.73], 0.46 [0.38–0.56] and 0.62 [0.51–0.77]). Meanwhile, a higher effect size was found for smoking (1.45 [1.14–1.84] compared to 1.25 [0.99–1.58], 1.06 [0.85–1.32] and 0.86 [0.69–1.08]) and alcohol consumption (1.22 [1.01–1.48] compared to 1.10 [0.90–1.33], 1.15 [0.96–1.38], and 1.07 [0.91–1.26]).

Conclusion
We observed different associations of parity, smoking and alcohol consumption with breast cancer risk across various birth cohorts.
ISSN
1465-542X
Language
English
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/198953
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-024-01766-0
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share