Publications

Detailed Information

Real-world outcomes of third-line immune checkpoint inhibitors versus irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a Korean, multicenter study (KCSG ST22-06)

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLim, Sung Hee-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Keun-Wook-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jae-Joon-
dc.contributor.authorIm, Hyeon-Su-
dc.contributor.authorKim, In-Ho-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Hye Sook-
dc.contributor.authorKoo, Dong-Hoe-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Jang Ho-
dc.contributor.authorMaeng, Chi Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Min-Young-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hyo Jin-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jwa Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Sang Gon-
dc.contributor.authorJung, Joo Young-
dc.contributor.authorShin, Seong-Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Ki Hyang-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyeyeong-
dc.contributor.authorOh, So Yeon-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Minsu-
dc.contributor.authorJung, Minkyu-
dc.contributor.authorRha, Sun Young-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-04T05:39:05Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-04T14:40:09Z-
dc.date.issued2024-02-23-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Cancer, Vol.24 no.252ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1471-2407-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/199042-
dc.description.abstractBackground
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) or irinotecan-based chemotherapy is frequently used after failure of second-line paclitaxel plus ramucirumab treatment for patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study aimed to compare the efficacy between ICI and irinotecan-based chemotherapy as third-line treatment in patients with AGC.

Methods
We retrospectively reviewed patients with AGC, whose third-line treatment started between July 2019 and June 2021 at 17 institutions in Korea. The ICI group included patients who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab, and the irinotecan-based chemotherapy group included patients who received irinotecan or FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan).

Results
A total of 363 patients [n = 129 (ICI) and n = 234 (irinotecan-based chemotherapy)] were analyzed. The median progression-free survival was 2.3 and 2.9 months in ICI and irinotecan-based chemotherapy groups, respectively (p = 0.802). The median overall survival (OS) was 5.5 and 6.0 months in ICI and irinotecan-based chemotherapy groups, respectively (p = 0.786). For all patients included in this study, multivariable analysis showed that weight loss, peritoneal metastasis, low serum sodium or albumin, and short duration of second-line treatment were associated with inferior OS (p < 0.05). ICI showed significantly longer OS than irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients without peritoneal metastasis. Whereas ICI showed significantly shorter OS in patients without PD-L1 expression than irinotecan-based chemotherapy.

Conclusions
No significant difference in survival outcome was observed between ICI and irinotecan-based chemotherapy as third-line treatment for AGC patients. ICI might be preferred for patients without peritoneal metastasis and irinotecan-based chemotherapy for patients with tumors without PD-L1 expression.
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBMCko_KR
dc.subjectGastric cancer-
dc.subjectThird-line treatment-
dc.subjectIrinotecan-
dc.subjectNivolumab-
dc.subjectPembrolizumab-
dc.titleReal-world outcomes of third-line immune checkpoint inhibitors versus irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a Korean, multicenter study (KCSG ST22-06)ko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12885-024-11972-wko_KR
dc.citation.journaltitleBMC Cancerko_KR
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
dc.date.updated2024-02-25T04:13:33Z-
dc.citation.number252ko_KR
dc.citation.volume24ko_KR
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share