Publications
Detailed Information
Ambisyllabicity versus Foot in English Segmental Phonology
Cited 0 time in
Web of Science
Cited 0 time in Scopus
- Authors
- Issue Date
- 2004
- Citation
- SNU Working Papers in English Language and Linguistics, Vol.3, pp. 204-222
- Keywords
- Ambisyllabicity ; Foot ; Flapping ; Glottalisation ; Aspiration ; Palatalisation
- Abstract
- There have been controversies in English Phonology that center around the raison d'é e of ambisyllabicity in accounting for English phonological processes. The goal of this thesis is to argue that ambisyllabicity provides a more rigorous account of English phonological phenomena. Specifically, it is shown in this thesis that ambisyllabicity-based approach explains flapping glottalisation, I-velatisation, and palatalisation more accurately than foot-based approach. This thesis claims that the existence of ambisyllabicity is well justified while foot-boundaries are not well defined in foot-based approach. In sum, this thesis reveals that foot-based approach cannot substitute ambisyIIabicity-based approach. The notion of ambisyllabicity is necessary because ambisyllabicity-based approach has the explanatory adequacy. This thesis illustrates how ambisyllabicity is incorporated into Optimality Theory.
- Language
- English
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.