Publications

Detailed Information

Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorJang, Mijung-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Nariya-
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Woo Kyung-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jeong Seon-
dc.contributor.authorSeong, Min Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorPark, In Ae-
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-22T09:09:59Z-
dc.date.available2009-05-22T09:09:59Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationAJR 2008; 191:1347-1351en
dc.identifier.issn1546-3141 (online)-
dc.identifier.issn0361-803X (print)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/3714-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) at sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast and to identify the factors involved. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 3,563 lesions con secutively evaluated with sonographically guided core biopsy between January 2002 and June 2006. Histologic analysis yielded ADH in 60 of the 3,563 lesions (1.7%). The rate of underestimation of ADH was determined by dividing the number of lesions that proved to be carcinoma at surgical excision by 44, the total number of lesions evaluated with excisional biopsy. Clinical, sonographic, and core biopsy features were analyzed to identify factors that affect the rate of underestimation of ADH. RESULTS: The rate of underestimation of ADH was found to be 48% (21 of 44 lesions). Underestimation of ADH was significantly less frequent for lesions evaluated with 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy than for lesions evaluated with 14-gauge automated gun biopsy (22% [four of 18 lesions] vs 65% [17 of 26 lesions], p = 0.012). The other clinical, sonographic, and biopsy features examined did not affect the rate of underestimation of ADH. CONCLUSION: For sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast, the rate of underestimation of ADH was 48%. This rate was lower for lesions evaluated with 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy (22%) than for those evaluated with 14-gauge automated gun biopsy (65%). This finding was particularly true of smaller lesions (< or = 2.0 cm) and for lesions of the mass-only type.en
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by grant A062260 from the Innovative
Research Institute for Cell Therapy, Republic of Korea.
en
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherAmerican Roentgen Ray Societyen
dc.subjectbiopsyen
dc.subjectbreasten
dc.subjectbreast neoplasmsen
dc.subjectdiagnosisen
dc.subjectsonographyen
dc.subjecttechnologyen
dc.titleUnderestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at sonographically guided core biopsy of the breasten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor장미정-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor조나리야-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor문우경-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박정선-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor성민현-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박인애-
dc.identifier.doi10.2214/AJR.07.3643-
dc.identifier.doi10.2214/AJR.07.3643-
dc.citation.journaltitleAJR. American journal of roentgenology-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share