SHERP

Self-reported experience and outcomes of care among stomach cancer patients at a median follow-up time of 27 months from diagnosis

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 4 time in scopus
Authors
Kim, Sung; Bae, Jae-Moon; Kim, Young-Woo; Ryu, Keun Won; Lee, Jun Ho; Noh, Jae-Hyung; Sohn, Tae-Sung; Hong, Seong-Kweon; Lee, Myung Kyung; Park, Sang Min; Yun, Young Ho
Issue Date
2007-10-03
Publisher
Springer Verlag
Citation
Support Care Cancer. 2008 Jul;16(7):831-9. Epub 2007 Oct 2.
Keywords
AdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesPsychometricsQuality of Health Care*Quality of LifeQuestionnairesStomach Neoplasms/diagnosis/physiopathology/*psychology/surgeryTime FactorsTreatment Outcome
Abstract
GOALS OF WORK: We aimed to identify clinical experiences associated with outcomes of care among stomach cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred thirty-two patients who had a diagnosis of stage I-III stomach cancer from 2001 through 2002 from two hospitals in South Korea responded to a survey questionnaire including sociodemographic and clinical data, information about care experiences, satisfaction with care, and quality of life (QOL). MAIN RESULTS: Involvement in decision making [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.13 to 2.89] and reflection of patients' opinions in treatment decisions (aOR = 2.54; 95% CI, 1.65 to 3.93) were associated with decision satisfaction. The factors associated with willingness to choose the same treatment over again were involvement in decision making (aOR = 2.37; 95% CI, 1.53 to 3.68) and no treatment toxicity (aOR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.87). Involvement in decision making, reflection of patients' opinions in treatment decisions, and treatment toxicity were associated with some functioning subscales of QOL (p < 0.05). Regular follow-up, however, was associated with poor social functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement efforts for stomach cancer patients should focus not only on the quality of primary tumor therapy but also on how patients experience their care, such as patient-centered decision making, experience of treatment toxicity, and regular follow-up.
ISSN
0941-4355 (Print)
Language
English
URI
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17909862

http://www.springerlink.com/content/w48727230r5n15g0/fulltext.pdf

http://hdl.handle.net/10371/46292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0340-x
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:
College of Medicine/School of Medicine (의과대학/대학원)Family Medicine (가정의학전공)Journal Papers (저널논문_가정의학전공)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse