Publications

Detailed Information

디지털 및 일반 측방두부규격방사선사진에서 측정 방법에 따른 계측치의 비교 : The comparison of cephalometric measurements between measuring methods in digital and conventional lateral cephalometric radiograph

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김미자-
dc.contributor.author허경회-
dc.contributor.author이원진-
dc.contributor.author허민석-
dc.contributor.author이삼선-
dc.contributor.author이진구-
dc.contributor.author안병근-
dc.contributor.author최순철-
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-01T06:09:51Z-
dc.date.available2010-02-01T06:09:51Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citation대한구강악안면방사선학회지 2005; 35 : 15-23.en
dc.identifier.issn1229-8212-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/47392-
dc.description.abstractPurpose : To compare cephalometric measurement between measuring methods in digital and conventional lateral cephalometric radiograph. Materials and Methods : Twenty digital and conventional lateral cephalometric radiographs were selected. In digital group, cephalometric measurements were performed manually using hardcopies and automatically using V-CephTM program on the monitor. In conventional group, the same measurements were performed manually on conventional films, and for automatic measurement conventional films were digitized by scanner. All measurements were performed twice by 4 observers, and 24 cephalometric variables were calculated and the time spent for each measurement was recorded. The differences in measurements data and the time spent for each measurement were compared within each group. Intra-observer and inter-observer comparisons were performed. Results : In both groups, no statistically significant difference between manual and automatic measurements was observed and most of the variables didn't show statistically significant differences between methods. The observer with less experience tended to show statistically significant differences of measurements between methods, and differences from other observers. The differences of measurements between methods in digital group were lesser than those of conventional group with statistical significance in 8 variables out of 24. With automatic method and in digital group, the spent time was shorter. Conclusion : With direct digital radiograph, automatic method using manually idenitified landmarks can be preferable in cephalometric analysis. (Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2005; 35 : 15-23)en
dc.language.isokoen
dc.publisher대한구강악안면방사선학회en
dc.subjectCephalometryen
dc.subjectImage Processingen
dc.subjectComputer-Assisteden
dc.subjectDigital Radiographyen
dc.title디지털 및 일반 측방두부규격방사선사진에서 측정 방법에 따른 계측치의 비교en
dc.title.alternativeThe comparison of cephalometric measurements between measuring methods in digital and conventional lateral cephalometric radiographen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorKim, Mi-Ja-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorHuh, Kyung-Hoe-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorYi, Won-Jin-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorHeo, Min-Suk-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorLee, Sam-Sun-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorLee, Jin-Koo-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorAhn, Byoung-Keun-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorChoi, Soon-Chul-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share