Publications

Detailed Information

Reexamining the organization theory: the validity of the bureaucratic and the human relations models

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKwon, Gi-Heon-
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-24T22:06:11Z-
dc.date.available2010-11-24T22:06:11Z-
dc.date.issued1996-
dc.identifier.citationKorean Journal of Policy Studies, Vol.11, pp. 89-103-
dc.identifier.issn1225-5017-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/70424-
dc.description.abstractVarious organizational theories are based on divergent assumptions about human
nature. Based on certain assumptions, the theorists justified administrative behavior in
formal organizations. At one extreme the Bureaucratic theorists assert that their theory,
based on the assumption that man is inherently selfish by nature, has validity and
university in an ideal sense. According to Weber, for example:
Experience tends universally to show that the purely bureaucratic type administrative
organization … is from the purely technical point of view, of attaining the highest degree
of efficiency and is in this sense formally the most rational known means of carrying out
imperative control over human beings. It is superior to any other form in precision, in
stability, in the stringency of its discipline, and in its reliability (Weber, 1947, p. 337)
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherGraduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University-
dc.titleReexamining the organization theory: the validity of the bureaucratic and the human relations models-
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor권기헌-
dc.citation.journaltitleKorean Journal of Policy Studies-
dc.citation.endpage103-
dc.citation.pages89-103-
dc.citation.startpage89-
dc.citation.volume11-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share