Publications
Detailed Information
The Global Imbalances from 1996 to 2009:Diagnosis and Prescriptions
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Hyeyoon Anna | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-10-31T08:23:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-10-31T08:23:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011-04 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 경제논집, Vol.50 No.1, pp. 53-99 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1738-1150 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/74485 | - |
dc.description.abstract | One of the main global economic concerns before the financial crisis in 2007/2008 was
the emergence of widening global imbalances, which refer to the large and persistent current account deficits experienced in the United States and the corresponding surpluses mainly in China, emerging Asia, and oil exporting countries. Not only the pattern and magnitude of the current account imbalances, but also the direction of global capital flows (from emerging to advanced countries) is peculiar. Many observers have already discussed different causes and explanations of global imbalances, e.g. the revived Bretton Woods system hypothesis, the asset shortage hypothesis, or the global savings glut theory. The main focus of recent debates lies on the sustainability of those imbalances and whether policy measures aiming on the reduction of imbalances should be adopted. The debate does not seem to have a clear answer which everyone agrees with. Some view global imbalances as an equilibrium outcome of asymmetries in financial development or in world asset demand and supply. For others, global imbalances are an unsustainable phenomenon which needs to be corrected through current account adjustment, dollar depreciation and reforms of financial institutions. This paper analyzes and evaluates the different views on the sustainability of global imbalances and asks whether a rebalancing mechanism is necessary or not. The key points which I focus on especially in this paper are as follows. First, I review and analyze the facts on global imbalances from 1996 to 2009. Second, I discuss viewpoints which suggest different positions — no-rush-to-rebalancing, rebalancing-is-harmful and rebalancing-isnecessary — and put them into the context of common theories on the roots of imbalances. Some of the theories try to explain or justify the sustainability of global imbalances. I argue that the U.S. current account deficit and foreign surpluses will not disappear automatically (even if the crisis led to an initial reduction of the imbalances). I further argue that the possible interaction of current account imbalances with domestic and systemic distortions bears risks of a global recession and that unless countermeasures to rebalance the global economy are adopted, current account imbalances are likely to return and increase again. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 경제연구소 | - |
dc.subject | Global imbalances | - |
dc.subject | Current account | - |
dc.subject | Savings | - |
dc.subject | Investment | - |
dc.subject | Exchange rates | - |
dc.subject | U.S. current account deficit | - |
dc.subject | Sustainability | - |
dc.subject | Bretton Woods II | - |
dc.subject | Demographic change | - |
dc.subject | Asset shortage | - |
dc.subject | Global savings glut | - |
dc.title | The Global Imbalances from 1996 to 2009:Diagnosis and Prescriptions | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 이혜윤 | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 경제논집 | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 99 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 53-99 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 53 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 50 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.