Publications

Detailed Information

Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), positron emission tomography (PET), and computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative locoregional staging of resectable esophageal cancer

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Jeongmin-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sang Gyun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Joo Sung-
dc.contributor.authorJung, Hyun Chae-
dc.contributor.authorSong, In Sung-
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-29T02:40:31Z-
dc.date.available2012-05-29T02:40:31Z-
dc.date.issued2010-06-
dc.identifier.citationSURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES; Vol.24 6; 1380-1386ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0930-2794-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/76526-
dc.description.abstractEndoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has been a useful method for the accurate staging of esophageal cancer. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of EUS, positron emission tomography (PET), and computed tomography (CT) in the locoregional staging of resectable esophageal cancer. A total of 109 patients with resectable esophageal cancer were prospectively enrolled and retrospectively reviewed for evaluation of preoperative EUS, PET, and CT. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of tumor depth (T) staging and regional lymph nodal (N) staging for each test were compared with the postoperative histopathologic stage as the gold standard. The overall accuracy of EUS for T staging was 72%, and it was the only method for delineating the layers of the esophageal wall. The sensitivities for N staging were 42% for EUS, 49% for PET, and 35% for CT, and their specificities were, respectively, 91, 87, and 93%. The accuracy for N staging was 66% for EUS, 68% for PET, and 63% for CT, and it did not differ significantly across the three tests. Preoperative EUS for the locoregional staging of esophageal cancer provides excellent T staging accuracy and similar accuracy for N staging compared with PET and CT. Especially in T staging, EUS could play an important role in the choice of candidates for esophageal cancer surgery.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherSPRINGERko_KR
dc.subjectComputed tomographyko_KR
dc.subjectTumor stagingko_KR
dc.subjectPositron emission tomographyko_KR
dc.subjectEndosonographyko_KR
dc.subjectEsophageal cancerko_KR
dc.titleComparison of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), positron emission tomography (PET), and computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative locoregional staging of resectable esophageal cancerko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최정민-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김상균-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김주성-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정현채-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor송인성-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00464-009-0783-x-
dc.citation.journaltitleSURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES-
dc.description.citedreferenceHsu WH, 2009, ANN THORAC SURG, V87, P1564, DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.065-
dc.description.citedreferencePuli SR, 2008, DIGEST DIS SCI, V53, P2405, DOI 10.1007/s10620-007-0152-3-
dc.description.citedreferencePuli SR, 2008, WORLD J GASTROENTERO, V14, P1479, DOI 10.3748/wjg.14.1479-
dc.description.citedreferencevan Vliet EPM, 2008, BRIT J CANCER, V98, P547, DOI 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604200-
dc.description.citedreferenceShimpi RA, 2007, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V66, P475, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2007.03.1051-
dc.description.citedreferencePfau PR, 2007, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V65, P377, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2006.12.015-
dc.description.citedreferenceLowe VJ, 2005, MOL IMAGING BIOL, V7, P422, DOI 10.1007/s11307-005-0017-0-
dc.description.citedreferencevan Westreenen HL, 2005, J GASTROINTEST SURG, V9, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.055-
dc.description.citedreferenceLiberale G, 2004, EJSO, V30, P942, DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.07.020-
dc.description.citedreferenceEnzinger PC, 2003, NEW ENGL J MED, V349, P2241-
dc.description.citedreferenceRasanen JV, 2003, ANN SURG ONCOL, V10, P954, DOI 10.1245/ASO.2003.12.002-
dc.description.citedreferenceGREENE FL, 2002, AJCC CANC STAGING MA-
dc.description.citedreferenceEloubeidi MA, 2001, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V54, P714-
dc.description.citedreferenceVazquez-Sequeiros E, 2001, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V53, P751, DOI 10.1067/mge.2001.112741-
dc.description.citedreferencePfau PR, 2000, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V95, P2813-
dc.description.citedreferenceChoi JY, 2000, J NUCL MED, V41, P808-
dc.description.citedreferenceWallace MB, 2000, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V51, P309-
dc.description.citedreferenceSalminen JT, 1999, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V34, P1178-
dc.description.citedreferenceLuketich JD, 1997, ANN THORAC SURG, V64, P765-
dc.description.citedreferenceROSCH T, 1995, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V5, P537-
dc.description.citedreferenceCATALANO MF, 1994, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V40, P442-
dc.description.citedreferenceVANDAM J, 1993, CANCER, V71, P2910-
dc.description.citedreferenceDWYER AJ, 1991, RADIOLOGY, V178, P328-
dc.description.tc10-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share