Publications

Detailed Information

Comparison of Triple Antiplatelet Therapy Including Triflusal and Conventional Dual Therapy in Patients Who Underwent Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorSuh, Jung-Won-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Song-Yi-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jin-Shik-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yong-Seok-
dc.contributor.authorKoo, Bon-Kwon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyo-Soo-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Hyun-Jae-
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-29T06:48:13Z-
dc.date.available2012-05-29T06:48:13Z-
dc.date.issued2009-11-
dc.identifier.citationINTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL; Vol.50 6; 701-709ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1349-2365-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/76559-
dc.description.abstractTriflusal is a derivative of acetylsalicylic acid but it exhibits different pharmacological and pharmacokinetic properties. The object of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of additional use of triflusal in patients who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation. First, we prospectively tested platelet function with a rapid platelet function analyzer (VerifyNow (R)-Aspirin) in patients with stable angina (male, age, 61.6 +/- 8.3, body weight, 69.3 +/- 11.2 kg) who maintained dual (aspirin 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg per clay, n = 23) or triple (aspirin 100 mg, clopidogrel 75 mg, and triflusal 300 mg per day, n = 23) therapy For more than one month. They were randomly assigned to a group. The triple group showed superior inhibition of arachidonic acid induced platelet aggregation compared to the dual group (420.2 +/- 47.7 ARU versus 465.0 +/- 71.2 ARU, P = 0.016). Second, we compared composite outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, and nonhemorrhagic stroke) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation between the dual (n = 1474) and triple (n = 433) groups in the prospective Seoul National University Hospital drug-eluting stent (SNUH-DES) cohort. The triple group had more current smokers, male patients, and patients with a previous history of revascularization. Also, the triple group underwent more complex interventions such as left main, chronic total occlusion, long lesion, and restenotic lesion than the dual group. In spite of their higher risk profiles, the triple group patients showed comparable composite outcomes (19 cases, 4.4%) to those of the dual group ones (41 cases, 2.8%) (P = 0.12). The triflusal-based triple antiplatelet therapy achieved superior platelet inhibition compared to the dual therapy ex vivo and it could be applied after complex intervention with DES. (Int Heart J 2009; 50: 701-709)ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherSPRINGERko_KR
dc.subjectTriflusalko_KR
dc.subjectAntiplatelet therapyko_KR
dc.subjectThrombosisko_KR
dc.subjectDrug-eluting stentko_KR
dc.titleComparison of Triple Antiplatelet Therapy Including Triflusal and Conventional Dual Therapy in Patients Who Underwent Drug-Eluting Stent Implantationko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor서정원-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김송이-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박진식-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김용석-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강현재-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor구본권-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김효수-
dc.citation.journaltitleINTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL-
dc.description.citedreferenceGomez-Isla T, 2008, ALZ DIS ASSOC DIS, V22, P21-
dc.description.citedreferenceGurbel PA, 2007, CIRCULATION, V115, P3156, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675587-
dc.description.citedreferenceSuh JW, 2007, INT J CARDIOL, V117, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.03.009-
dc.description.citedreferencePamukcu B, 2006, J THROMB THROMBOLYS, V22, P103, DOI 10.1007/s11239-006-8952-4-
dc.description.citedreferenceWang TH, 2006, EUR HEART J, V27, P647, DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi684-
dc.description.citedreferenceHankey GJ, 2006, LANCET, V367, P606, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68040-9-
dc.description.citedreferenceGurbel PA, 2005, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V46, P1827, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.056-
dc.description.citedreferenceChen WH, 2005, AM J CARDIOL, V96, P760, DOI 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.04.056-
dc.description.citedreferenceCOSTA J, 2005, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V20, P4296-
dc.description.citedreferenceMatetzky S, 2004, CIRCULATION, V109, P3171, DOI 10.1161/01.CIR.0000130846.46168.03-
dc.description.citedreferenceCulebras A, 2004, NEUROLOGY, V62, P1073-
dc.description.citedreferenceCOLEMAN J, 2004, POINT CARE, V3, P77-
dc.description.citedreferenceMatias-Guiu J, 2003, STROKE, V34, P840, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000063141.24491.50-
dc.description.citedreferenceBhatt DL, 2003, NAT REV DRUG DISCOV, V2, P15, DOI 10.1038/nrd985-
dc.description.citedreferenceAcarin L, 2002, STROKE, V33, P2499, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000028184.80776.58-
dc.description.citedreferenceZAN S, 2002, MINERVA CARDIOANGIOL, V50, P263-
dc.description.citedreferencede Miguel LS, 2000, EUR J CLIN INVEST, V30, P811-
dc.description.citedreferenceCruz-Fernandez JM, 2000, EUR HEART J, V21, P457-
dc.description.citedreferencede Arriba AF, 1999, MOL PHARMACOL, V55, P753-
dc.description.citedreferenceBayon Y, 1999, BRIT J PHARMACOL, V126, P1359-
dc.description.citedreferenceMcNeely W, 1998, DRUGS, V55, P823-
dc.description.citedreferencede Miguel LS, 1998, EUR J PHARMACOL, V343, P57-
dc.description.citedreferenceLopezPousa S, 1997, REV NEUROLOGIA, V25, P1525-
dc.description.citedreferenceCercek B, 1997, ATHEROSCLEROSIS, V131, P59-
dc.description.citedreferenceAUTERI A, 1995, INT J CLIN PHARM RES, V15, P57-
dc.description.citedreferencePLAZA L, 1993, CARDIOLOGY, V82, P388-
dc.description.citedreferenceESMATJES E, 1990, DIABETES CARE, V13, P1114-
dc.description.citedreferenceESMATJES E, 1989, DIABETES RES CLIN PR, V7, P285-
dc.description.citedreferenceDECASTELLARNAU C, 1988, PROSTAG LEUKOTR ESS, V31, P83-
dc.description.tc0-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share