Publications

Detailed Information

Evaluation of preoperative criteria used to predict lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHan, Seung-Su-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sang Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Dong Ho-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jae Weon-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Soon-Beom-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Yong Sang-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Noh-Hyun-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-05T00:52:14Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-05T00:52:14Z-
dc.date.issued2010-02-
dc.identifier.citationACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA; Vol.89 2; 168-174ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0001-6349-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/76820-
dc.description.abstractObjective. To evaluate whether we could accurately predict lymph node (LN) metastasis with preoperative tests in endometrial cancer. Design. Retrospective study. Setting. Seoul National University Hospital, South Korea. Population. Three hundred patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging including lymphadenectomy between January 1999 and July 2007. Methods. We reviewed the medical records of 300 patients with endometrial cancer. The preoperative factors used to predict LN metastasis were as follows: old age (>= 55 years), serum CA-125 level [level >= 20 U/mL (if age < 50 years), level >= 28 U/mL (if age >= 50 years)], non-endometrioid histologic type and Grade 3, metastatic LN assessed by pelvic MRI or CT, and deep myometrial invasion assessed by pelvic MRI only. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the significant predictive factors. Main outcome measures. Sensitivity/specificity and false positive/negative rates. Results. Thirty patients had LN metastasis. Although LN evaluation by pelvic MRI or CT and high CA-125 level were the significant independent predictors for LN metastasis, the sensitivity/specificity and false positive/negative rates for LN metastasis by these two combined preoperative tests were 86.7%/71.4% and 68.7%/2.7%, respectively. However, the sensitivity/specificity and false positive/negative rates for LN metastasis by six combined preoperative tests were 100%/28.9% and 84.6%/0%, respectively. Conclusions. The six combined preoperative tests are useful in selecting patients without LN metastasis in endometrial cancer. Lymphadenectomy could be avoided in about 29% of patients with endometrial cancer who have no LN metastasis by using six combined preoperative tests.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS ASko_KR
dc.subjectEndometrial cancerko_KR
dc.subjectlymphatic metastasisko_KR
dc.subjectlymphadenectomyko_KR
dc.titleEvaluation of preoperative criteria used to predict lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancerko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor한승수-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이상훈-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김동호-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김재원-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박노현-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강순범-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor송용상-
dc.citation.journaltitleACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA-
dc.description.citedreferenceHan SS, 2008, MED SCI MONITOR, V14, pCR183-
dc.description.citedreferenceChan JK, 2007, LANCET ONCOL, V8, P831-
dc.description.citedreferenceChan JK, 2007, CANCER, V109, P2454, DOI 10.1002/cncr.22727-
dc.description.citedreferenceHidaka T, 2007, EJSO-EUR J SURG ONC, V33, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.09.035-
dc.description.citedreferenceZuurendonk LD, 2006, EJSO, V32, P450, DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.02.008-
dc.description.citedreferenceJemal A, 2006, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V56, P106-
dc.description.citedreferenceNomura H, 2006, INT J GYNECOL CANCER, V16, P799-
dc.description.citedreferenceSanjuan A, 2006, INT J GYNECOL CANCER, V16, P385-
dc.description.citedreferenceMARIANI A, 2006, P 11 INT GYN CANC SO-
dc.description.citedreferenceBen-Shachar I, 2005, OBSTET GYNECOL, V105, P487, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000149151.74863.c4-
dc.description.citedreferenceFrumovitz M, 2004, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V199, P388, DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.258-
dc.description.citedreferenceTodo Y, 2003, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V188, P1265, DOI 10.1067/mob.2003.318-
dc.description.citedreferenceYenen MC, 2003, EUR J GYNAECOL ONCOL, V24, P327-
dc.description.citedreferenceMatsumoto K, 2002, CANCER LETT, V180, P83-
dc.description.citedreferenceReinhardt MJ, 2001, RADIOLOGY, V218, P776-
dc.description.citedreferenceKucera E, 2000, GYNECOL OBSTET INVES, V49, P62-
dc.description.citedreferenceBarnes MN, 2000, SEMIN RADIAT ONCOL, V10, P3-
dc.description.citedreferenceObermair A, 1999, INT J GYNECOL CANCER, V9, P383-
dc.description.citedreferencePodratz KC, 1998, GYNECOL ONCOL, V70, P163-
dc.description.citedreferenceBenedetti-Panici P, 1998, INT J GYNECOL CANCER, V8, P322-
dc.description.citedreferenceKurihara T, 1998, GYNECOL ONCOL, V69, P192-
dc.description.citedreferenceYokoyama Y, 1997, GYNECOL ONCOL, V64, P411-
dc.description.citedreferenceGEISLER JP, 1996, EUR J GYNAECOL ONCOL, V17, P204-
dc.description.citedreferenceBELINSON JL, 1992, GYNECOL ONCOL, V44, P17-
dc.description.citedreferenceZURAWSKI VR, 1990, GYNECOL ONCOL, V36, P299-
dc.description.citedreferenceCREASMAN WT, 1987, CANCER, V60, P2035-
dc.description.tc6-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share