Publications

Detailed Information

Early rupture of membranes after the spontaneous onset of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Seung Mi-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kyung A-
dc.contributor.authorLee, JoonHo-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Chan-Wook-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Bo Hyun-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-05T01:37:29Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-05T01:37:29Z-
dc.date.issued2010-02-
dc.identifier.citationEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; Vol.148 2; 152-157ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0301-2115-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/76830-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The objective of this study was to examine if patients with "early rupture of membranes (ROM)" after spontaneous onset of labor are at increased risk of cesarean section. Study design: The rate of cesarean section was examined in 447 term singleton nulliparas who were admitted after the spontaneous onset of labor. The cases were divided into 2 groups: (1) "early ROM", defined as ROM at a cervical dilatation <4 cm (n = 109); and (2) "late ROM", ROM at a cervical dilatation >= 4 cm (n = 338). Results: (1) "Early ROM" occurred in 24.4% of the cases and the overall cesarean section rate was 5.6%; (2) there were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics including prepregnancy BMI, proportion of complicated pregnancies, total duration of labor, proportion of regional anesthesia, gestational age at delivery, and birthweight between the two groups of cases. However gravidas with "early ROM" were of advanced maternal age and had less cervical dilation on admission, shorter duration of 1st stage of labor, and more frequent use of oxytocin augmentation; (3) patients with "early ROM" had a threefold higher rate (11.9% vs. 3.6%) of cesarean section and a fourfold higher rate (11.9% vs. 3.0%) of cesarean section due to failure of progress than did those with "late ROM" (p < 0.005 for each); (3) 92% (23/25) of cesarean sections were performed due to failure to progress; and (4) there was no significant difference in the rate of histologic chorioamnionitis between the two groups of cases. Conclusion: "Early ROM" after the spontaneous onset of labor is a risk factor for cesarean section in term singleton nulliparas. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BVko_KR
dc.subjectEarly rupture of membranesko_KR
dc.subjectLaborko_KR
dc.subjectCesarean sectionko_KR
dc.subjectTermko_KR
dc.titleEarly rupture of membranes after the spontaneous onset of labor as a risk factor for cesarean deliveryko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이승미-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이경아-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이준호-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박찬욱-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor윤보현-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.10.031-
dc.citation.journaltitleEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-
dc.description.citedreferenceRoman H, 2008, ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN, V87, P163, DOI 10.1080/00016340701762975-
dc.description.citedreferenceSelin L, 2008, ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN, V87, P216, DOI 10.1080/00016340701837744-
dc.description.citedreferenceCHAN BC, 2008, J PERINAT MED-
dc.description.citedreferenceLiu SL, 2007, CAN MED ASSOC J, V176, P455, DOI 10.1503/cmaj.060870-
dc.description.citedreferenceGETAHUN D, 2007, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V197, pE1-
dc.description.citedreferencePark KH, 2006, J OBSTET GYNAECOL RE, V32, P482, DOI 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00443.x-
dc.description.citedreferenceTreacy A, 2006, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V195, P760, DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.052-
dc.description.citedreferenceGross MM, 2005, BIRTH-ISS PERINAT C, V32, P27-
dc.description.citedreferenceCUNNINGHAM FG, 2005, WILLIAMS OBSTET DYST, P503-
dc.description.citedreferenceCUNNINGHAM FG, 2005, WILLIAMS OBSTET PART, P157-
dc.description.citedreferenceBurrows LJ, 2004, OBSTET GYNECOL, V103, P907, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124568.71597.ce-
dc.description.citedreferenceHager RME, 2004, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V190, P428, DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.08.037-
dc.description.citedreferenceHarper MA, 2003, OBSTET GYNECOL, V102, P273, DOI 10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00408-3-
dc.description.citedreferenceMinkoff H, 2003, NEW ENGL J MED, V348, P946-
dc.description.citedreference2003, OBSTET GYNECOL, V102, P1445-
dc.description.citedreferenceFeinstein U, 2002, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V77, P7-
dc.description.citedreferenceSheiner E, 2002, ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN, V81, P222-
dc.description.citedreferenceFraser WD, 2002, OBSTET GYNECOL, V99, P409-
dc.description.citedreferenceHogberg U, 2000, GYNECOL OBSTET INVES, V49, P160-
dc.description.citedreferenceBlackwell SC, 2000, J PERINAT MED, V28, P316-
dc.description.citedreferenceSeyb ST, 1999, OBSTET GYNECOL, V94, P600-
dc.description.citedreferenceYeast JD, 1999, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V180, P628-
dc.description.citedreferenceGilbert WM, 1999, OBSTET GYNECOL, V93, P9-
dc.description.citedreferenceYOON BH, 1995, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V172, P960-
dc.description.citedreferenceHANDA VL, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V81, P758-
dc.description.citedreferenceSATIN AJ, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V79, P913-
dc.description.citedreferenceROMERO R, 1992, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V166, P129-
dc.description.citedreferencePIPER JM, 1991, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V165, P976-
dc.description.citedreferenceSILVER RK, 1986, OBSTET GYNECOL, V68, P587-
dc.description.citedreferenceDUFF P, 1983, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V147, P391-
dc.description.tc1-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share