Publications

Detailed Information

The Feasibility of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Nephrectomy: Initial Experience Using Home-made Single-port Device

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHan, Woong Kyu-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Yong Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorJeon, Hwang Gyun-
dc.contributor.authorJeong, Wooju-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Hwang-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyeon Hoe-
dc.contributor.authorRha, Koon Ho-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-14T06:20:18Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-14T06:20:18Z-
dc.date.issued2010-10-
dc.identifier.citationUROLOGY; Vol.76 4; 862-865ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0090-4295-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/77071-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES To report our early experience with laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) nephrectomy using home-made single-port device for benign nonfunctioning kidney. METHODS A total of 14 patients with benign nonfunctioning kidney underwent transperitoneal LESS nephrectomy by 2 experienced laparoscopic surgeons. The indications for nephrectomy were nonfunctioning kidney associated with ectopic kidney (n = 2), ureteropelvic junction obstruction (n = 5), genitourinary tuberculosis (n = 4), ureter stone (n = 2), and ureter stricture (n = 1). RESULTS All procedures were completed successfully. The mean operative time was 151 (85-230) minutes, estimated blood loss 108 (negligible-500) mL, and postoperative hospital stay 3.1 (2-6) days. There were no major complications. CONCLUSIONS LESS nephrectomy is a feasible and safe surgical option for benign nonfunctioning kidney.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCko_KR
dc.titleThe Feasibility of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Nephrectomy: Initial Experience Using Home-made Single-port Deviceko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor한웅규-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박용현-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor전황균-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정우주-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor라군호-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최황-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김현회-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.urology.2009.10.038-
dc.citation.journaltitleUROLOGY-
dc.description.citedreferenceRane A, 2009, BJU INT, V104, P230, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08399.x-
dc.description.citedreferenceRaman JD, 2009, EUR UROL, V55, P1198, DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.019-
dc.description.citedreferencePark YH, 2009, J ENDOUROL, V23, P833, DOI 10.1089/end.2009.0025-
dc.description.citedreferenceKommu SS, 2009, BJU INT, V103, P1034, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08282.x-
dc.description.citedreferenceBarret E, 2009, J ENDOUROL, V23, P135, DOI 10.1089/end.2008.0472-
dc.description.citedreferenceCanes D, 2008, EUR UROL, V54, P1020, DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.009-
dc.description.citedreferenceDELGADO S, 2008, GASTROENTEROL HEPATO, V31, P515-
dc.description.citedreferenceRaman JD, 2007, UROLOGY, V70, P1039, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.001-
dc.description.citedreferenceManohar T, 2007, J ENDOUROL, V21, P1323, DOI 10.1089/end.2007.9883-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee KS, 2002, UROLOGY, V60, P411-
dc.description.citedreferenceGupta NP, 1997, J LAPAROENDOSC ADV A, V7, P131-
dc.description.citedreferenceCLAYMAN RV, 1991, J UROLOGY, V146, P278-
dc.description.tc12-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share