Publications

Detailed Information

Three-Dimensional MDCT for Preoperative Local Staging of Gastric Cancer Using Gas and Water Distention Methods: A Retrospective Cohort Study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, Hee Sun-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jeong Min-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Se Hyung-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jae Young-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Joon Koo-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Byung Ihn-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Han-Kwang-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-29T04:56:29Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-29T04:56:29Z-
dc.date.issued2010-12-
dc.identifier.citationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY; Vol.195; no.6; 1316-1323ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0361-803X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/77924-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to compare the T-staging accuracy and lesion detectability of MDCT with gas distention versus water distention according to the surgical and histopathologic findings, for the preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. For a 3-month period, 113 consecutive patients (72 men and 41 women; age range, 23-85 years; mean age, 58 years) with 116 surgically confirmed gastric cancers from a single institution were included in our study. All patients had undergone preoperative MDCT with either effervescent granules taken orally (n = 55) or after having drunk 1,000 mL of tap water (n = 58) to create gastric distention. In addition to transverse images, multiplanar reformation images and 3D surface shaded display images were also obtained with gas distention CT, and multiplanar reformation images were obtained with water distention CT. The CT images were retrospectively reviewed by two abdominal radiologists separately with regard to T staging and lesion detectability. The accuracy values were compared between the two methods using Fisher`s exact test. RESULTS. The T-staging accuracy for gastric cancer did not differ significantly between gas distention and water distention CT scans, according to both radiologists (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the staging accuracy values for T1a cancers on gas distention CT scans for radiologists 1 and 2 were also comparable with those of water distention CT scans (91.1% vs 85% for radiologist 1 and 89.3% vs 85% for radiologist 2; p > 0.05). However, the tumor detection rate was significantly higher on gas distention CT scans using 2D and surface shaded display images for both radiologists (94.6% for radiologist 1 and 91.1% for radiologist 2), compared with the rates for water distention CT scans (78.3% and 73.3%) or gas distention CT scans using only 2D images (75.0% and 67.9%) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION. MDCT using the gas distention technique showed performance comparable to that of the water distention technique for the T staging of preoperative gastric cancer with better lesion detectability.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherAMER ROENTGEN RAY SOCko_KR
dc.subject3D reconstructionko_KR
dc.subjectstomachko_KR
dc.subjectsurface shaded displayko_KR
dc.subjectoral contrastagentko_KR
dc.subjectCTko_KR
dc.subjectMDCTko_KR
dc.subjectneoplasmko_KR
dc.titleThree-Dimensional MDCT for Preoperative Local Staging of Gastric Cancer Using Gas and Water Distention Methods: A Retrospective Cohort Studyko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박희선-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이정민-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김세형-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이재영-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor양한광-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor한준구-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최병인-
dc.identifier.doi10.2214/AJR.10.4320-
dc.citation.journaltitleAMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY-
dc.description.citedreferenceEDGE SB, 2010, AJCC CANC STAGING MA-
dc.description.citedreferenceNeuhaus H, 2009, DIGEST ENDOSC, V21, pS4, DOI 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2009.00864.x-
dc.description.citedreferenceCatalano F, 2009, SURG ENDOSC, V23, P1581, DOI 10.1007/s00464-009-0350-5-
dc.description.citedreferenceIsomoto H, 2009, GUT, V58, P331, DOI 10.1136/gut.2008.165381-
dc.description.citedreferenceChoh MS, 2009, SURG CLIN N AM, V89, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.suc.2008.09.017-
dc.description.citedreferenceWoo SK, 2008, CLIN RADIOL, V63, P1236, DOI 10.1016/j.crad.2008.06.007-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee MW, 2008, ABDOM IMAGING, V33, P255, DOI 10.1007/s00261-007-9253-x-
dc.description.citedreferenceErturk SM, 2008, EUR J RADIOL, V66, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.05.015-
dc.description.citedreferenceYu JS, 2007, AM J ROENTGENOL, V189, pW315, DOI 10.2214/AJR.07.2672-
dc.description.citedreferenceShin KS, 2007, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V31, P741-
dc.description.citedreferenceChen CY, 2007, RADIOLOGY, V242, P472-
dc.description.citedreferenceHur J, 2006, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V30, P372-
dc.description.citedreferenceConio M, 2006, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V101, P653, DOI 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00424.x-
dc.description.citedreferenceODA I, 2006, GASTRIC CANCER, V9, P262-
dc.description.citedreferenceShimizu K, 2005, AM J ROENTGENOL, V185, P1152, DOI 10.2214/AJR.04.0651-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim SH, 2005, AM J ROENTGENOL, V185, P1180, DOI 10.2214/AJR.04.1812-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim HJ, 2005, RADIOLOGY, V236, P879, DOI 10.1148/rdiol.2363041101-
dc.description.citedreferenceSoetikno R, 2005, J CLIN ONCOL, V23, P4490-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim AY, 2005, ABDOM IMAGING, V30, P465, DOI 10.1007/s00261-004-0273-5-
dc.description.citedreferenceHabermann CR, 2004, RADIOLOGY, V230, P465, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2302020828-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim SK, 2003, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V27, P140-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee JH, 2000, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V24, P777-
dc.description.citedreferenceFleischer D, 2000, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V52, P440-
dc.description.citedreferenceTada M, 2000, J GASTROEN HEPATOL, V15, pD98-
dc.description.citedreferenceGOTODA T, 2000, GASTRIC CANCER, V3, P219-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee DH, 2000, ABDOM IMAGING, V25, P1-
dc.description.citedreferenceDux M, 1999, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V23, P913-
dc.description.citedreferenceRossi M, 1999, AM J ROENTGENOL, V172, P383-
dc.description.citedreferenceTakao M, 1998, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V22, P288-
dc.description.citedreferenceRossi M, 1997, EUR RADIOL, V7, P659-
dc.description.citedreferenceFukuya T, 1997, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V21, P73-
dc.description.citedreferenceWinter TC, 1996, RADIOLOGY, V201, P365-
dc.description.citedreferenceMINAMI M, 1992, RADIOLOGY, V185, P173-
dc.description.citedreferenceGOSSIOS KJ, 1991, GASTROINTEST RADIOL, V16, P293-
dc.description.tc2-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share