Publications

Detailed Information

Prismatic correction of residual esotropia of 20 prism dioptres or less after full hypermetropic correction

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHan, S. B.-
dc.contributor.authorHwang, J-M-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-29T05:37:14Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-29T05:37:14Z-
dc.date.issued2009-11-
dc.identifier.citationEYE; Vol.23 11; 2052-2055ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0950-222X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/77944-
dc.description.abstractPurpose To assess the efficacy of prismatic correction of residual esotropia <= 20 prism dioptres (PD) after full hypermetropic correction in patients with partially accommodative esotropia. Methods Medical records of 64 patients who received prismatic correction for residual esotropia <= 20 PD were reviewed. Outcomes were considered successful if patients maintained orthotropia or esophoria for at least 1 year and did not require surgery. Factors including age, sex, visual acuity, refractive errors, amount of deviation, sensory status, and the presence of amblyopia were analysed and compared between the success and failure groups. Results Prismatic correction was successful in 28 of 64 patients (44%). The success group showed better results both with Worth 4-dot test (P = 0.001 at distance and P = 0.046 at near) and Randot stereo test (P = 0.003 for dots and P = 0.000 for animals). Success rate increased to 58% without amblyopia, 72 and 93% with normal fusional response at near and at distance with Worth 4 dot test respectively, and 92% with stereoacuity of 800 s of arc or better. In all patients in success group, fusion and stereoacuity improved or maintained during follow-up. Conclusions Prismatic correction was successful in 44% of the patients with residual esotropia <= 20 PD and the success group showed an improved or stable sensory status with time. With a baseline fusion on Worth 4-dot test or stereopsis of 800 s of arc or better, prismatic correction could be considered as the first-line treatment. Eye (2009) 23, 2052-2055; doi:10.1038/eye.2008.424; published online 30 January 2009ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherNATURE PUBLISHING GROUPko_KR
dc.subjectamblyopiako_KR
dc.subjectstereopsisko_KR
dc.subjectfusionko_KR
dc.subjectpartially accommodative esotropiako_KR
dc.subjectbinocularityko_KR
dc.subjectprismatic correctionko_KR
dc.titlePrismatic correction of residual esotropia of 20 prism dioptres or less after full hypermetropic correctionko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/eye.2008.424-
dc.citation.journaltitleEYE-
dc.description.citedreferenceKoc F, 2006, EYE, V20, P325, DOI 10.1038/sj.eye.6701874-
dc.description.citedreferenceBirch EE, 2005, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V46, P526, DOI 10.1167/iovs.04-0618-
dc.description.citedreferenceBerk AT, 2004, J AAPOS, V8, P384, DOI 10.1016/j.jaapas.2004.02.001-
dc.description.citedreferenceBirch EE, 2004, J AAPOS, V8, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.jaapos.2003.10.003-
dc.description.citedreferenceFawcett SL, 2003, J AAPOS, V7, P256, DOI 10.1016/S1091-8531(03)00111-3-
dc.description.citedreferenceVONNOORDEN GK, 2002, BINOCULAR VISION OCU-
dc.description.citedreferenceWeakley DR, 2001, J AAPOS, V5, P153-
dc.description.citedreferenceHwang JM, 2001, J AAPOS, V5, P31, DOI 10.1067/mpa.2001.111782-
dc.description.citedreferenceHavertape SA, 1999, J PEDIAT OPHTH STRAB, V36, P69-
dc.description.citedreferenceKUSHNER BJ, 1995, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V113, P1530-
dc.description.citedreferenceSWAN KC, 1983, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V90, P1141-
dc.description.citedreferenceHIATT RL, 1983, J PEDIATR OPHTHALMOL, V20, P199-
dc.description.citedreferenceMILLER JE, 1960, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V49, P1350-
dc.description.tc1-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share