Publications

Detailed Information

The Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Testicular Rupture: A Prospective Preliminary Study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Seung Ho-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Sungchan-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Seung Hong-
dc.contributor.authorJeong, Woo Kyoung-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Jun Ho-
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-02T04:41:05Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-02T04:41:05Z-
dc.date.issued2009-01-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE; Vol.66 1; 239-242ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0022-5282-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/78070-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan is useful for the evaluation of the testis because of high soft-tissue contrast and its multiplanar capability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively the efficacy of MRI for the diagnosis of testicular rupture in blunt scrotal trauma. Methods: From January to December 2006, seven consecutive patients (mean age 22 years, range 21-23 years) that presented with blunt scrotal trauma were enrolled in this prospective study. The patients underwent scrotal sonography (US), and supplementary MRI was performed before exploratory surgery. The essential sequences of the MRI were T2-weighted coronal, axial, and sagittal scans. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI was evaluated by means of the surgical findings as the reference standard. Results: The diagnostic accuracy of MRI was 100% (7 of 7). Three cases with testicular rupture were diagnosed accurately. Interruption of the dark signal intensity line of the tunica albuginea was pathognomonic for the diagnosis of testicular rupture. Two cases with an inconclusive diagnosis after US were accurately diagnosed as epididymal hematomas. The remaining two cases also showed concordant results with the surgical findings. Conclusions. MRI can be a useful alternative diagnostic modality for blunt scrotal trauma in limited conditions, especially under circumstances where the use of US infrequently results in an inconclusive diagnosis.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINSko_KR
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imagingko_KR
dc.subjectTraumako_KR
dc.subjectTestisko_KR
dc.subjectScrotumko_KR
dc.titleThe Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Testicular Rupture: A Prospective Preliminary Studyko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김승호-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박성찬-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최승홍-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정우경-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최준호-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/TA.0b013e318156867f-
dc.citation.journaltitleJOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE-
dc.description.citedreferenceDogra VS, 2003, RADIOLOGY, V227, P18, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2271001744-
dc.description.citedreferenceKIM SH, 2003, RADIOLOGY ILLUSTRATE, V628, P660-
dc.description.citedreferencePavlica P, 2001, EUR RADIOL, V11, P220-
dc.description.citedreferenceSATAKE H, 2001, HINYOKIKA KIYO, V47, P341-
dc.description.citedreferenceKubik-Huch RA, 1999, EUR RADIOL, V9, P16-
dc.description.citedreferenceSerra AF, 1998, UROLOGY, V51, P1018-
dc.description.citedreferenceLin WW, 1998, J UROLOGY, V159, P841-
dc.description.citedreferenceHorstman WG, 1997, UROL CLIN N AM, V24, P653-
dc.description.citedreferenceOSBORN AG, 1994, DIAGNOSTIC NEURORADI, P154-
dc.description.citedreferenceKRATZIK C, 1989, J UROLOGY, V142, P1243-
dc.description.citedreferenceCASS AS, 1983, J UROLOGY, V129, P299-
dc.description.citedreferenceGROSS M, 1969, J UROLOGY, V101, P196-
dc.description.tc2-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share