Publications

Detailed Information

Gadobutrol-enhanced, Three-Dimensional, Dynamic MR Imaging With MR Cholangiography for the Preoperative Evaluation of Bile Duct Cancer

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorRyoo, Inseon-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jeong Min-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Yong Eun-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Hee Sun-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Joon Koo-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Byung Ihn-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Se Hyung-
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-04T04:51:35Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-04T04:51:35Z-
dc.date.issued2010-04-
dc.identifier.citationINVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY; Vol.45 4; 217-224ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0020-9996-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/78399-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of 1.0-M gadobutrol-enhanced, 3-dimensional (3D), dynamic MR images with 3D-MR cholangiography (MRC) in the preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer staging and resectability. Materials and Methods: Our institutional review board approved this retrospective study. Sixty patients (46 male, 14 female; mean age 65.9 years; range, 45-77 years) with surgically and pathologically proven bile duct cancers, were included in this study. Two gastrointestinal radiologists evaluated the biliary MR images, including 3D-MRC and gadobutrol-enhanced, dynamic images, using a 3D-gradient echo (GRE) technique, regarding the longitudinal tumor extent, vascular involvement of the bile duct cancer, lymph node metastasis, and tumor resectability. The results were compared with the surgical and pathology findings used as the reference standards. Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) of the 2 reviewers was 0.95 and 0.93, respectively, for evaluation of the involvement of both secondary biliary confluences and 0.85 and 0.84, respectively, for assessment of the intrapancreatic duct. For determining the tumor resectability, the overall accuracy was 0.93 and 0.88, respectively, whereas for assessment of the vascular involvement, the Az values were 0.92 for reviewer 1 and 0.70 for reviewer 2 for the portal vein evaluation, and 0.99 for reviewer 1 and 0.76 for reviewer 2 for the hepatic artery evaluation. In the assessment of lymph node metastasis, the overall accuracy was approximately 0.77 for each reviewer. Conclusion: One-molar, gadobutrol-enhanced, dynamic imaging, using a 3D-GRE technique with isotropic 3D-MRC showed excellent diagnostic capability for assessing the longitudinal extent and tumor resectability of bile duct cancer, although it generally underestimated the tumor involvement of vessels and lymph nodes.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINSko_KR
dc.subjectbile duct cancerko_KR
dc.subjectMR cholangiographyko_KR
dc.subjectgadobutrolko_KR
dc.titleGadobutrol-enhanced, Three-Dimensional, Dynamic MR Imaging With MR Cholangiography for the Preoperative Evaluation of Bile Duct Cancerko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor류인선-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이정민-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정용은-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박희선-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김세형-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor한준구-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최병인-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181d2eeb1-
dc.citation.journaltitleINVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY-
dc.description.citedreferenceJanus N, 2010, EUR J RADIOL, V73, P357, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.11.021-
dc.description.citedreferenceHahn G, 2009, INVEST RADIOL, V44, P776-
dc.description.citedreferenceIdee JM, 2009, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V47, P855, DOI 10.1016/j.rcl.2009.06.006-
dc.description.citedreferenceAttenberger UI, 2009, INVEST RADIOL, V44, P251-
dc.description.citedreferenceGakhal MS, 2009, SURG ONCOL CLIN N AM, V18, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.soc.2008.12.009-
dc.description.citedreferenceHammerstingl R, 2009, INVEST RADIOL, V44, P168-
dc.description.citedreferenceSeeger A, 2008, J CARDIOVASC MAGN R, V10, DOI 10.1186/1532-429X-10-63-
dc.description.citedreferenceChoi JY, 2008, AM J ROENTGENOL, V191, P1448, DOI 10.2214/AJR.07.3992-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim JK, 2008, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V28, P714, DOI 10.1002/jmri.21480-
dc.description.citedreferenceAkduman EI, 2008, ACAD RADIOL, V15, P641, DOI 10.1016/j.acra.2007.12.023-
dc.description.citedreferencePark HS, 2008, AM J ROENTGENOL, V190, P396, DOI 10.2214/AJR.07.2310-
dc.description.citedreferenceChoi JY, 2008, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V27, P94, DOI 10.1002/jmri.21038-
dc.description.citedreferenceChoi JY, 2008, EUR RADIOL, V18, P78, DOI 10.1007/s00330-007-0670-6-
dc.description.citedreferenceHeilmaier C, 2007, RADIOLOGY, V245, P872, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2453062103-
dc.description.citedreferenceEndo I, 2007, SURGERY, V142, P666, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.018-
dc.description.citedreferenceUnno M, 2007, J HEPATO-BILIARY-PAN, V14, P434, DOI 10.1007/s00534-006-1191-4-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim HJ, 2007, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V31, P469-
dc.description.citedreferenceKhan AZ, 2007, BRIT J SURG, V94, P393, DOI 10.1002/bjs.5783-
dc.description.citedreferenceCho ES, 2007, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V31, P72-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee HY, 2006, RADIOLOGY, V239, P113, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2383050419-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim HJ, 2006, RADIOLOGY, V238, P300, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2381041902-
dc.description.citedreferenceKhan SA, 2005, LANCET, V366, P1303-
dc.description.citedreferenceHanninen EL, 2005, ACTA RADIOL, V46, P462, DOI 10.1080/02841850510021625-
dc.description.citedreferenceZhong L, 2005, WORLD J GASTROENTERO, V11, P3756-
dc.description.citedreferenceHemming AW, 2005, ANN SURG, V241, P693-
dc.description.citedreferenceLim JH, 2004, ABDOM IMAGING, V29, P540, DOI 10.1007/s00261-004-0187-2-
dc.description.citedreferenceZech CJ, 2004, EUR RADIOL, V14, P1174, DOI 10.1007/s00330-004-2327-z-
dc.description.citedreferenceAnderson CD, 2004, ONCOLOGIST, V9, P43-
dc.description.citedreferenceManfredi R, 2003, ABDOM IMAGING, V28, P319, DOI 10.1007/s00261-002-0047-x-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee MG, 2003, WORLD J SURG, V27, P278, DOI 10.1007/s00268-002-6701-1-
dc.description.citedreferenceSAITO K, 2003, RADIOGRAPHICS, V23, pE8-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee SS, 2002, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V56, P25, DOI 10.1067/mge.2002.125363-
dc.description.citedreferenceJarnagin WR, 2001, ANN SURG, V234, P507-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim MJ, 2000, RADIOLOGY, V214, P173-
dc.description.citedreferenceKosuge T, 1999, ANN SURG, V230, P663-
dc.description.citedreferenceHochwald SN, 1999, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V134, P261-
dc.description.citedreferenceTillich M, 1998, AM J ROENTGENOL, V171, P651-
dc.description.citedreferenceHann LE, 1998, RADIOLOGY, V206, P651-
dc.description.citedreferenceMiyazaki M, 1998, SURGERY, V123, P131-
dc.description.citedreferenceHeslin MJ, 1998, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V133, P149-
dc.description.citedreferenceLu DSK, 1997, AM J ROENTGENOL, V168, P1439-
dc.description.citedreferenceKlempnauer J, 1997, J CLIN ONCOL, V15, P947-
dc.description.citedreferenceNakeeb A, 1996, ANN SURG, V224, P463-
dc.description.citedreferenceMcFarland EG, 1996, AM J ROENTGENOL, V166, P37-
dc.description.citedreferenceNESBIT GM, 1988, AM J ROENTGENOL, V151, P933-
dc.description.tc3-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share