Publications
Detailed Information
Modified Impingement Test Can Predict the Level of Pain Reduction After Rotator Cuff Repair
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Oh, Joo Han | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Sae Hoon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Kyung Hwan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Oh, Chung Hee | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gong, Hyun Sik | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-07-04T08:00:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-04T08:00:24Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-07 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE; Vol.38, No.7; 1383-1388 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.issn | 0363-5465 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/78477 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Most patients experience a significant reduction in pain after rotator cuff repair. However, there is currently no method to predict the level of pain reduction that each patient will experience. This report explores the usefulness of the modified impingement test for prognosis in cases of rotator cuff repair. Hypothesis: The amount of pain reduction after injection of lidocaine into the subacromial space preoperatively correlates with the level of pain reduction after rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Preoperatively, a visual analog scale for pain was measured in 153 patients (59 males and 94 females) with a rotator cuff tear before and after injection of lidocaine into the subacromial space. Subsequently, rotator cuff repair was performed. At least 1 year after surgery, the visual analog scale for pain and satisfaction, Constant score, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and University of California, Los Angeles shoulder rating scale were evaluated. Correlation analyses were performed between the change in visual analog scale after the modified impingement test and after surgery. Results: The amount of pain reduction after the modified impingement test was significantly related to improvement of pain postoperatively (P<.001), as measured using the visual analog scale for pain. The change in ASES score was also related to the amount of pain reduction after the modified impingement test (P=.001); however, the other tests showed no statistical significance (P>.05). Univariate regression analysis revealed that a 0.621-unit reduction in postoperative pain on the visual analog scale could be expected for each 1 unit (on a scale of 10) reduction in pain after lidocaine injection preoperatively. Conclusion: The amount of pain reduction after the modified impingement test preoperatively correlated with the improvement of pain after rotator cuff repair. This simple preoperative test could help patients understand the subjective level of pain reduction that they may experience after rotator cuff repair. | ko_KR |
dc.language.iso | en | ko_KR |
dc.publisher | SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC | ko_KR |
dc.subject | rotator cuff tear | ko_KR |
dc.subject | pain | ko_KR |
dc.subject | modified impingement test | ko_KR |
dc.subject | functional outcome | ko_KR |
dc.title | Modified Impingement Test Can Predict the Level of Pain Reduction After Rotator Cuff Repair | ko_KR |
dc.type | Article | ko_KR |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 오주한 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 김새훈 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 김경환 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 오충희 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 공현식 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0363546509359071 | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Myers JB, 2009, J SCI MED SPORT, V12, P603, DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.06.003 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Oh JH, 2009, ARTHROSCOPY, V25, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.08.010 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Oh JH, 2008, ARTHROSCOPY, V24, P983, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.06.007 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Olley LM, 2008, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V90, P326, DOI 10.1308/003588408X285964 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | KANG MN, 2008, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V17, pS61 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Skedros JG, 2007, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P130, DOI 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31804a8581 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Gladstone JN, 2007, AM J SPORT MED, V35, P719, DOI 10.1177/0363546506297539 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | LEE E, 2007, J SHOULDER ELBOW SUR, V16, P1 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Mathews PV, 2005, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V14, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2004.06.012 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | O`Holleran JD, 2005, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V87A, P121, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.C.01316 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Mair SD, 2004, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V13, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2003.12.006 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Galatz LM, 2004, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V86A, P219 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Van Linthoudt D, 2003, JOINT BONE SPINE, V70, P271, DOI 10.1016/S1297-319X(03)00036-8 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Yamakado K, 2002, ARTHROSCOPY, V18, P887, DOI 10.1053/jars.2002.35263 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Ruotolo C, 2002, ARTHROSCOPY, V18, P527, DOI 10.1053/jars.2002.31707 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Kirkley A, 2002, ARTHROSCOPY, V18, P8, DOI 10.1053/jars.2002.29913 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Gerber C, 2000, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V82A, P505 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Payne LZ, 1997, AM J SPORT MED, V25, P801 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | NEER CS, 1983, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P70 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | HAWKINS RJ, 1980, AM J SPORT MED, V8, P151 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | KESSEL L, 1977, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V59, P166 | - |
dc.description.tc | 1 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
- There are no files associated with this item.
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.