Publications

Detailed Information

Modified Impingement Test Can Predict the Level of Pain Reduction After Rotator Cuff Repair

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorOh, Joo Han-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sae Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Kyung Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorOh, Chung Hee-
dc.contributor.authorGong, Hyun Sik-
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-04T08:00:24Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-04T08:00:24Z-
dc.date.issued2010-07-
dc.identifier.citationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE; Vol.38, No.7; 1383-1388ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0363-5465-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/78477-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Most patients experience a significant reduction in pain after rotator cuff repair. However, there is currently no method to predict the level of pain reduction that each patient will experience. This report explores the usefulness of the modified impingement test for prognosis in cases of rotator cuff repair. Hypothesis: The amount of pain reduction after injection of lidocaine into the subacromial space preoperatively correlates with the level of pain reduction after rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Preoperatively, a visual analog scale for pain was measured in 153 patients (59 males and 94 females) with a rotator cuff tear before and after injection of lidocaine into the subacromial space. Subsequently, rotator cuff repair was performed. At least 1 year after surgery, the visual analog scale for pain and satisfaction, Constant score, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and University of California, Los Angeles shoulder rating scale were evaluated. Correlation analyses were performed between the change in visual analog scale after the modified impingement test and after surgery. Results: The amount of pain reduction after the modified impingement test was significantly related to improvement of pain postoperatively (P<.001), as measured using the visual analog scale for pain. The change in ASES score was also related to the amount of pain reduction after the modified impingement test (P=.001); however, the other tests showed no statistical significance (P>.05). Univariate regression analysis revealed that a 0.621-unit reduction in postoperative pain on the visual analog scale could be expected for each 1 unit (on a scale of 10) reduction in pain after lidocaine injection preoperatively. Conclusion: The amount of pain reduction after the modified impingement test preoperatively correlated with the improvement of pain after rotator cuff repair. This simple preoperative test could help patients understand the subjective level of pain reduction that they may experience after rotator cuff repair.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS INCko_KR
dc.subjectrotator cuff tearko_KR
dc.subjectpainko_KR
dc.subjectmodified impingement testko_KR
dc.subjectfunctional outcomeko_KR
dc.titleModified Impingement Test Can Predict the Level of Pain Reduction After Rotator Cuff Repairko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor오주한-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김새훈-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김경환-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor오충희-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor공현식-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0363546509359071-
dc.citation.journaltitleAMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE-
dc.description.citedreferenceMyers JB, 2009, J SCI MED SPORT, V12, P603, DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.06.003-
dc.description.citedreferenceOh JH, 2009, ARTHROSCOPY, V25, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.08.010-
dc.description.citedreferenceOh JH, 2008, ARTHROSCOPY, V24, P983, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.06.007-
dc.description.citedreferenceOlley LM, 2008, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V90, P326, DOI 10.1308/003588408X285964-
dc.description.citedreferenceKANG MN, 2008, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V17, pS61-
dc.description.citedreferenceSkedros JG, 2007, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P130, DOI 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31804a8581-
dc.description.citedreferenceGladstone JN, 2007, AM J SPORT MED, V35, P719, DOI 10.1177/0363546506297539-
dc.description.citedreferenceLEE E, 2007, J SHOULDER ELBOW SUR, V16, P1-
dc.description.citedreferenceMathews PV, 2005, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V14, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2004.06.012-
dc.description.citedreferenceO`Holleran JD, 2005, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V87A, P121, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.C.01316-
dc.description.citedreferenceMair SD, 2004, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V13, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2003.12.006-
dc.description.citedreferenceGalatz LM, 2004, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V86A, P219-
dc.description.citedreferenceVan Linthoudt D, 2003, JOINT BONE SPINE, V70, P271, DOI 10.1016/S1297-319X(03)00036-8-
dc.description.citedreferenceYamakado K, 2002, ARTHROSCOPY, V18, P887, DOI 10.1053/jars.2002.35263-
dc.description.citedreferenceRuotolo C, 2002, ARTHROSCOPY, V18, P527, DOI 10.1053/jars.2002.31707-
dc.description.citedreferenceKirkley A, 2002, ARTHROSCOPY, V18, P8, DOI 10.1053/jars.2002.29913-
dc.description.citedreferenceGerber C, 2000, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V82A, P505-
dc.description.citedreferencePayne LZ, 1997, AM J SPORT MED, V25, P801-
dc.description.citedreferenceNEER CS, 1983, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P70-
dc.description.citedreferenceHAWKINS RJ, 1980, AM J SPORT MED, V8, P151-
dc.description.citedreferenceKESSEL L, 1977, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V59, P166-
dc.description.tc1-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share