Publications
Detailed Information
Why Not a Topic in a Relative Clause?
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Bak, Sung-Yun | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-01-07T07:19:02Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-01-07T07:19:02Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1984 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 어학연구, Vol.20 No.2, pp. 163-179 | ko_KR |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0254-4474 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/85707 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | What is of interest in the interaction of relativization and topicalization is that it is not possible for the two rules to apply in a single clause and produce a topic within a relative clause. Consider the following Korean sentences.
(1) *i salam-i (i chaek-un Chelswu-ka cwun) Yenghi-ita. this man SM this book TOP SM gave be '*This is Yenghi whom the book Chelswu gave to.' (2) '*(Yenghi-nun Chelswu-ka manna-n) hakkyo-ka phakoytoYessta. TOP SM met school SM was-detroyed '*The school which Yenghi Chelswu met in was destroyed.' (3) *(ku totwuk-un caphi-n) swunkyeung-i sang-ul patassta. the thief TOP was-caught policeman prize received. '*The policeman whom the thief he was caught by was awarded.' | ko_KR |
| dc.language.iso | en | ko_KR |
| dc.publisher | 서울대학교 언어교육원 | ko_KR |
| dc.title | Why Not a Topic in a Relative Clause? | ko_KR |
| dc.type | SNU Journal | ko_KR |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.