Publications

Detailed Information

Remarks on Noun Phrases in English

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sun-Woong-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-07T07:30:29Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-07T07:30:29Z-
dc.date.issued1987-
dc.identifier.citation어학연구, Vol.23 No.2, pp. 217-232ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0254-4474-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/85770-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we deal with some facts concerning the movement out of and within noun phrases in English. For a proper analysis, subject (SPEC) positions of NP are divided into two kinds: A-position and A'-position. The NP with A subject, which is nexal in its nature, is a barrier if the NP is not L·marked, whereas the NP with A' ·subject as well as the NP with non-specific determiner, i. e., non·nexal NPs are an inherent barrier, for they cannot be L·marked. The original version of the Minimality Condition proposed in Chomsky (1986) is modified in a substantive way to accomodate the facts of nominals in English. With the proposals described above, along with the assumption that the noun is not a proper governor, as many linguists including Kayne claim, it is possible to explain some facts about movement in NPs in a consistent way with the help of the Empty Category Principle (ECP).ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisher서울대학교 언어교육원ko_KR
dc.titleRemarks on Noun Phrases in Englishko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
dc.citation.journaltitle어학연구-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share