공무원에 대한 명예훼손의 법리
Legal Theory of Defamation against Government Officials

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Issue Date
서울대학교 법학연구소
법학, Vol.42 No1 pp.258-287
public figure명예훼손으로 인한 손해배상을 청구국민의 알권리명예훼손의 관련 법리
Defamation on public figures such as broadcasters, lawyers, public
prosecutors, incumbent or former assemblymen, including even the President,
by the press has recently been increased for last 2 or 3 years. Defamatory
litigations, consequently, have also been on the increase by public figures for
their compensations.
Among the cases, we have met some controvertible issues about scopes of
eligibility of parties and limitations on freedom of the press' fair comment. In
defamatory cases related to specific official's government affairs, the legal
theory, concerning right of information access and defamation, should be
clarified, since defamation against public figures usually conflicts with right of
information access if it is not an issue of very private concerns. Even though,
defamation was involved in the official's private sector, in some cases of
government affairs, courts convicted of defamation for people's right of
information access. As we would see those cases in this Article, we might
find out there are some limits; legal theory of defamation against public
figures has to be handled differently from that against the public.
This Article introduces recent defamation cases on public figures in Korea,
which are conflicted with right of information access, press' liabilities, and
eligibilities of parties, and analyzes legal theory of defamation on public
figures comparing that of Korea with that of some foreign countries, such as
England, France, Germany, and the United States, using related cases in those...
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:
College of Law/Law School (법과대학/대학원)The Law Research Institute (법학연구소) 법학법학 Volume 42, Number 1/4 (2001)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.