Publications
Detailed Information
창작과 표절의 구별기준 : Substantial Similarity Tests as Applied to Artistic and Functional Works
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 정상조 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-09-13T23:25:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-13T23:25:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 법학, Vol.44 No.1, pp. 107-140 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-222X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://lawi.snu.ac.kr/ | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/9145 | - |
dc.description.abstract | While imitation was respected for more than 500 years in the Chosun
Dynasty, creativity and originality is now of much more value than before as Korea moves toward a knowledge-based society. In parallel with the increase in the economic value of knowledge, demands for creative ideas and original expression have grown up rapidly for the past few decades. Accordingly, an increasing number of disputes have centered around the idea/expression dichotomy and any similarity between a copyrighted work and allegedly infringing work. Supreme Court of Korea has shown its sconflicting views on idea/expression dichotomy and originality criteria. For example, while it required a very low level of originality with regard to a eye-test chart, it denied copyright protection for a photograph made for a purpose of merchandise catalogue on the grounds that originality or artistic elements in the photograph in question was not enough for copyright protection. It is interesting to see whether these apparently conflicting views of the Supreme Court might affect its decisions on substantial similarity in cases of copyright infringement. This paper then moves on to the main topic of the substantial similarity test. Having found that there are relatively few decisions on the substantial similarity, the author first tries and introduces to the paper a brief analysis of various tests adopted by U.S. courts, which are found as unanimous in distinguishing artistic works from functional works. In the field of artistic... | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 법학연구소 | - |
dc.subject | 표절에 관한 도덕적 규범 | - |
dc.subject | 창작의 보호 | - |
dc.subject | 창작적 아이디어 | - |
dc.subject | 저작권법 | - |
dc.title | 창작과 표절의 구별기준 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Substantial Similarity Tests as Applied to Artistic and Functional Works | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Jeong, Sang Jo | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 법학 | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 140 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 107-140 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 107 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 44 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.