Browse

Reflections on the Korean Jury Trial

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors
Hans, Valerie P.
Issue Date
2014-12
Publisher
School of Law, Seoul National University
Citation
Journal of Korean Law, Vol.14 No.1, pp. 81-115
Keywords
Korean jury trialjury studiesjuryjudgelegal reformjuror’s guidebifurcated trialdeliberationdeliberative democracy
Abstract
Korea’s experience with its new jury system offers many lessons for those interested in juries and jury reform worldwide. Aiming for a unique jury system that was ideally suited to Korean citizens and their legal system, those who crafted Korea’s jury incorporated elements of both classic jury systems and mixed tribunals. Initially, the jury deliberates on guilt independently of the judge, but the procedure includes optional as well as mandatory opportunities for the presiding judge to advise the jury during its deliberation. The Korean jury delivers an advisory rather than binding jury verdict. These and other features of the Korean jury system are analyzed and contrasted with practices elsewhere. The unique procedures associated with Korean jury trials offer a natural experiment and deserve continuing serious study.
ISSN
1598-1681
Language
English
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10371/93860
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:
College of Law/Law School (법과대학/대학원)The Law Research Institute (법학연구소) Journal of Korean LawJournal of Korean Law Volume 14 Number 1/2 (2014/2015)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse