Publications
Detailed Information
Power and Knowledge: International Relations Scholarship in the Core and Periphery
Cited 0 time in
Web of Science
Cited 0 time in Scopus
- Authors
- Issue Date
- 2016-11
- Citation
- Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, Vol.4 No.2, pp. 241-270
- Keywords
- knowledge production ; core-periphery ; International Relations theory ; academic survival ; productivity and professionalization
- Abstract
- The field of International Relations (IR) is motivated as much by the institutional dynamics of American universities and the internal rewards structure of tenure, promotion, and merit pay, as it is by wider scholarly recognition. This article discusses how the incentives of the U.S. academe influence IR theory and how it imitates the preferences of American foreign policy. Moreover, this article denotes that IR scholarship has abstracted away from the realities of international affairs and it does not speak of, or speak to those in the far away periphery. It concludes by discussing two promising movements: Global IR and Planet Politics. Global IR involves rebuilding the theories of IR by incorporating contributions from the periphery, whereas Planet Politics is a manifesto for rewriting IR as a set of practices based on the concept of Anthropocene by proposing a new ontology that is driven by the dread of planetary extinction.
- ISSN
- 2288-2693 (print)
2288-2707 (online)
- Language
- English
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.