Publications
Detailed Information
원고적격(原告適格)의 정치경제학 - 한일 양국의 행정(사건)소송법 개정안에 대한 비교,분석을 중심으로 - : Political Economy of Standing -Focusing on Comparative Study of Korea`s and Japan`s Respective Amendments to Administrative Litigation Act -
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 조홍식 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-09-27T23:25:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-27T23:25:07Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 법학, Vol.46 No.2, pp. 70-133 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-222X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://lawi.snu.ac.kr/ | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/9894 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Korea and Japan have recently made efforts to reform each of their
administrative litigation system by drafting amendments to each country's Administrative Litigation Act. Although constitutional provisions and court precedents in both countries are similar to each other, they have come up with their respective amendments that are different from one another. The Korean Supreme Court's amendment to the Administrative Litigation Act expands the scope of an individual's standing to file an administrative lawsuit. This in effect provides an interest party with a tool to affect the legality of an administrative activity. On the contrary, Japan amended its Administrative Litigation Act, but has preserved its original structure of standing, thereby addressing administrative lawsuits as subjective lawsuits. Many perspectives can be considered in examining divergent legal reforms in the two countries. The cultural approach that focuses on the differences in culture of the two countries in analyzing the causes is useful in looking at the big picture, but it fails to provide pertinent information necessary to devise a detailed reform plan. In contrast, a political economic analysis centers its attention upon the political structure that has brought about the difference between Korea and Japan. Focusing on the political structure enables one to examine what concrete institutional factors and what political participants' interactions have resulted in divergence between the two countries. Hence, such analysis builds a foundation necessary to devise a detailed and remedial plan. | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | 이 논문은 서울대학교 법학발전재단 출연 법학연구소 기금의 2005학년도 교내연구비
의 보조를 받았음. | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 법학연구소 | - |
dc.subject | 한일 양국의 행정소송법 개정논의 | - |
dc.subject | 정치경제학적 분석 | - |
dc.subject | 사법권에 관한 규정 | - |
dc.subject | 일본의 개정법률 | - |
dc.title | 원고적격(原告適格)의 정치경제학 - 한일 양국의 행정(사건)소송법 개정안에 대한 비교,분석을 중심으로 - | - |
dc.title.alternative | Political Economy of Standing -Focusing on Comparative Study of Korea`s and Japan`s Respective Amendments to Administrative Litigation Act - | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Cho, Hong Sik | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 법학 | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 133 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 70-133 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 70 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 46 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.