Publications

Detailed Information

Changes in views on digital intraoral scanners among dental hygienists after training in digital impression taking

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, Hye-Ran-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Ji-Man-
dc.contributor.authorChun, Youn-Sic-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kkot-Nim-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Minji-
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-07T06:45:10Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-07T06:45:10Z-
dc.date.issued2015-11-27-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Oral Health, 15(1):151ko_KR
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/100488-
dc.descriptionThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
ko_KR
dc.description.abstractAbstract

Backgrounds
Despite the rapid development of digital dentistry, the use of digital intraoral scanners remains limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in views on intraoral scanners among dental hygienists after training.


Methods
Thirty-four dental hygienists with >3years of clinical experience participated and were divided into 2 groups : iTero and Trios groups. Participants of each group practiced the usage of both intraoral scanners, for total 12 times over 4 sessions, Questionnaires were given to participants at two different times; prior to and after the completion of the training sessions. The parameters of questionnaires included on difficulty of use, patient discomfort, awareness, preference, and clinical usefulness of intraoral scanners and comparison of two types of scanners.


Results
Upon the completion of the training, both iTero and Trios groups gave positive feedback on anticipated accuracy, efficiency, and clinical usefulness. More participants of the iTero group responded that the level of difficulty of use and patient discomfort was greater than Trios. Both groups preferred Trios for its clinical usefulness.


Conclusions
The perceptions of dental hygienists on usage of intraoral scanner and digital impression improved positively with the training. The participants favored Trios over iTero in terms of difficulty of use , patient comfort, and clinical usefulness. This study showed that appropriate training could change the views on the efficiency of intraoral scanners positively among dental hygienists.
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBioMed Centralko_KR
dc.subjectDigital intraoral scannerko_KR
dc.subjectPerception of digital impressionko_KR
dc.subjectTraining of intraoral scannerko_KR
dc.titleChanges in views on digital intraoral scanners among dental hygienists after training in digital impression takingko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박혜란-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박지만-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor전윤식-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김민지-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12903-015-0140-5-
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderPark et al.-
dc.date.updated2017-01-06T10:08:18Z-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share