Browse

노동쟁의조정법 제정심의의 주요쟁점
The Critical Issues in the Consideration on Enactment of the Labor Dispute Adjustment Act

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors
이흥재
Issue Date
2008
Publisher
서울대학교 법학연구소
Citation
법학, Vol.49 No.1, pp. 27-52
Keywords
노동쟁의조정법쟁의행위의 금지쟁의행위의 개시대체근로자의 채용금지손해배상청구권의 제한쟁의행위의 절차적 제한the Labor Dispute Adjustment Actthe forbidden clause with respect to a eneral strikea requirement for taking Labor dispute regarding the application of the Preli근로자의 구속제한직장폐쇄의 보고
Abstract
This article attempts to scrutinize the critical issues with regard to the

establishment of the Labor Dispute Adjustment Act 1953 (the LDAA) and the

spirit of the legislation in order to let these serve as a lesson to the further

legislation. Accordingly, the subject and range of this study are within the limit

of major issues at the consideration and discussion for the enactment by mainly

analyzing the stenographic records of the Second National Assembly (SNA)

which was in the turmoil of the Korean War at the refuge Capital Pusan in

1953. The most crucial points at the consideration on enactment of the LDAA

were the forbidden clause with respect to a general strike, and one of the

requirements for taking labor dispute regarding the application of the Preliminary

Arbitration System into the general industry. Other major points at issue were

the limits on a confinement of worker during labor dispute period, the

prohibition on the claim for damages due to labor disputes (regardless of

lawfulness), and so on.

Amongst the most critical issues of the Original Bill of the LDAA (OB)

drafted by Social Health Committee of the SNA, two significant changes were

made in line with the Revised Bill of the LDAA (RB) submitted by Jin-Han

Jeon, who was a member of the SNA and the first Minister of Social Affairs

under the regime of President Seung-Man Lee deleting the provision of the OB

that prohibited a general strike and newly-enacting the forbidden clause on

appointing a general industry as a public interest service in labor dispute for

protection against any further administrative intervention. Additionally, the third

crucial change regarding the limits on the claim for damages due to labor...
ISSN
1598-222X
Language
Korean
URI
http://lawi.snu.ac.kr/

https://hdl.handle.net/10371/10201
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:
College of Law/Law School (법과대학/대학원)The Law Research Institute (법학연구소) 법학법학 Volume 49, Number 1/4 (2008)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse