Publications
Detailed Information
Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Seung Ja | - |
dc.contributor.author | Moon, Woo Kyung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cho, Nariya | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cha, Joo Hee | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Sun Mi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Im, Jung-Gi | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-10-13T23:23:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-10-13T23:23:27Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006-09-23 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Radiology 2006;241:695-701 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0033-8419 (Print) | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1527-1315 (Electronic) | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17114620 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/10420 | - |
dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the sensitivity of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for depicting breast cancer in three digital mammographic views. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted with institutional review board approval; informed consent was waived. A commercially available CAD system was applied to the craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral digital mammographic views of 83 women (mean age, 48 years; range, 30-66 years) with 83 histologically proved breast cancers. Findings were 59 masses and 41 microcalcifications (17 lesions showed both findings; 42 lesions, mass only; and 24 lesions, microcalcification only). The paired t test was used to analyze sensitivity of the CAD system for the detection of cancer in these three mammographic views and in combinations of the views. RESULTS: The sensitivities of the CAD system were 92% (76 of 83) in the craniocaudal view, 83% (69 of 83) in the mediolateral oblique view, and 86% (71 of 83) in the mediolateral view; the differences were not significant (P = .07-.62). Sensitivity increased to 96% (80 of 83) in the craniocaudal plus mediolateral oblique views and to 99% (82 of 83) in the craniocaudal plus mediolateral oblique plus mediolateral views. For masses, the sensitivity of the CAD system was 76% (45 of 59) in the craniocaudal view and 75% (44 of 59) in the mediolateral oblique view and increased to 93% (55 of 59) when mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal views were combined (P < .001). For microcalcifications, sensitivity was 98% (40 of 41) in the craniocaudal view and 95% (39 of 41) in the mediolateral oblique view, and this increased to 100% (41 of 41) when the mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal views were combined (P = .31). CONCLUSION: The sensitivities of the CAD system were not significantly different among these three digital mammographic views. Sensitivity for depicting masses was significantly increased (P < .001) when the craniocaudal view was added to the mediolateral oblique view. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Radiological Society of North America | en |
dc.subject | Breast Neoplasms/*radiography | en |
dc.subject | False Positive Reactions | en |
dc.subject | Mammography/*methods | en |
dc.subject | Patient Selection | en |
dc.subject | Retrospective Studies | en |
dc.subject | Sensitivity and Specificity | en |
dc.subject | Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted | - |
dc.title | Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 김승자 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 문우경 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 조나리야 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 차주희 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 김선미 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 임정기 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1148/radiol.2413051145 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
- There are no files associated with this item.
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.