Publications

Detailed Information

Analysis of the long-term hearing results after the surgical repair of aural atresia

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorChang, Sun O.-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Byung Yoon-
dc.contributor.authorHur, Dong Gu-
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-27T14:22:07Z-
dc.date.available2009-10-27T14:22:07Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationLaryngoscope 2006;116:1835-1841en
dc.identifier.issn0023-852X (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17003716-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/10826-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: Careful surgical candidate selection guarantees a high probability of serviceable hearing postoperatively in congenital aural atresia (CAA) patients. The authors analyzed hearing results after CAA surgery with long-term follow-up (F/U) with respect to several clinical factors. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. METHODS: The medical records of 93 CAA patients (100 ears) who underwent operations from January 1987 through December 2002 at Seoul National University Hospital were reviewed. Mean duration was 56.9 months. The authors evaluated the results of hearing after surgery over 3 year F/U with a view to clarifying the factors accounting for unsuccessful results. RESULTS: Approximately 64% of patients treated surgically achieved a considerable hearing gain over long-term F/U. Postoperative hearing remained relatively stable over the period from 6 months to 3 years postoperatively, yielding only 2.75 dB of aggravation. However, hearing results in revision cases deteriorated with time, which led to statistically higher air-conduction thresholds than those of primary cases at the 1 and 3 year F/Us. Resultantly, only 26.6% of patients having achieved a poor hearing gain post first surgery benefited from revision audiologically. The severity of microtia was found to help predict poor long-term hearing outcomes after CAA surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Nonrevision cases and cases with mild microtia appear to have acceptable and stable long-term hearing results. Disappointing long-term hearing results in revision, and severe microtia cases should lead to considerations of alternative options in these cases, such as bone-anchored hearing aids, which offer reliable and stable results.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherLaryngoscopeen
dc.subjectAudiometry, Pure-Toneen
dc.subjectAuditory Threshold/physiologyen
dc.subjectBone Conduction/physiologyen
dc.subjectEar Canal/*abnormalities/surgeryen
dc.subjectEar, External/*abnormalities/surgeryen
dc.subjectHearing/*physiologyen
dc.subjectHearing Disorders/*congenital/surgeryen
dc.subjectLongitudinal Studiesen
dc.subjectOssicular Prosthesisen
dc.subjectReoperationen
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiesen
dc.subjectSkin Transplantationen
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subjectTympanoplasty/methodsen
dc.titleAnalysis of the long-term hearing results after the surgical repair of aural atresiaen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor장선오-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최병윤-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor허동구-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/01.mlg.0000233703.52308.73-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share