Publications

Detailed Information

Value of adding T1-weighted image to MR cholangiopancreatography for detecting intrahepatic biliary stones

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 25 time in Scopus
Authors

Kim, Young Kon; Kim, Chong Soo; Lee, Jeong Min; Ko, Seog Wan; Chung, Gyung Ho; Lee, Seung Ok; Han, Young Min; Lee, Sang Yong

Issue Date
2006
Publisher
American Roentgen Ray Society
Citation
AJR 2006; 187:W267-274
Keywords
biliary systemMR cholangiopancreatographyMRIMR techniqueT1-weighted image
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the value of adding a T1-weighted image to MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) to detect bile duct stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 30-month period, 148 patients suspected of having biliary stones and who underwent MRI including MRCP, a fat-suppressed T1-weighted fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence, and an axial HASTE sequence were enrolled in this study. The biliary stones were confirmed by ERCP, surgery, and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. Of these 148 patients, 73 had extrahepatic stones, 45 had intrahepatic stones, 20 had both extrahepatic and intrahepatic stones, and 10 had no biliary stones. Two separate sets of images, the MRCP set (composed of MRCP and axial HASTE) and the combined interpretion of the MRCP set and the T1-weighted image, were analyzed independently and separately by two observers. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic method. The sensitivity and specificity were also calculated. RESULTS: For common duct stones, the diagnostic accuracy and the sensitivity of both image sets showed similar values without any significant difference (0.998 [97.8%] for the combined interpretation; 0.988 [97.8%] for observer 1 and 0.995 [96.8%] for observer 2 for the MRCP set). However, for the intrahepatic stones, the diagnostic accuracy (0.993) and the sensitivity (98.5%) of the combined interpretation were significantly higher than those of the MRCP set for the two observers (0.926 [83.8%] for observer 1 and 0.922 [85.3%] for observer 2) (p < 0.05). No significant difference was seen in the specificity of the two image sets for both the intrahepatic and the common duct stones. CONCLUSION: Combining the axial T1-weighted image with MRCP is valuable for detecting intrahepatic stones.
ISSN
0361-803X (Print)
1546-3141 (Electronic)
Language
English
URI
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=16928904

https://hdl.handle.net/10371/10827
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0266
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share