Publications

Detailed Information

Transfer Paradox and Bargaining Solutions

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorChun, Youngsub-
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-21T01:12:31Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-21T01:12:31Z-
dc.date.issued1996-07-
dc.identifier.citationSeoul Journal of Economics, Vol.9 No.3, pp. 181-190-
dc.identifier.issn1225-0279-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/1083-
dc.description.abstractWe investigate whether bargaining solutions are immune to the transfer paradox for n-person bargaining problems. We show that two families of bargaining solutions, one generalizing the Nash solution and another generalizing the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution, are immune to the strong transfer paradox requiring the donor gains and the recipient loses. Also, we present examples demonstrating that the Nash and the Kalai-Smorodinsky solutions are subject to the weak transfer paradox so that the donor and the recipient could gain together or lose together.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherInstitute of Economic Research, Seoul National University-
dc.subjectbargaining solution-
dc.subjectdonor gain-
dc.subjectKalai-Smorodinsky-
dc.titleTransfer Paradox and Bargaining Solutions-
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor전영섭-
dc.citation.journaltitleSeoul Journal of Economics-
dc.citation.endpage190-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.pages181-190-
dc.citation.startpage181-
dc.citation.volume9-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share