Publications

Detailed Information

Design and evaluation of electron beam energy degraders for breast boost irradiation

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jong In-
dc.contributor.authorHa, Sung Whan-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jung-in-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hyunseok-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jaegi-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Il Han-
dc.contributor.authorYe, Sung-Joon-
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-17T09:00:17Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-17T18:05:39Z-
dc.date.issued2016-08-31-
dc.identifier.citationRadiation Oncology, 11(1):112ko_KR
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/109836-
dc.description.abstractBackground
For breast cancer patients who require electron boost energies between 6 and 9MeV, an energy degraders (ED) in the 9MeV beamline was specially designed and manufactured to increase the skin dose of 6MeV and to reduce the penetration depth of 9MeV beams.

Methods
We used Monte Carlo (MC) techniques as a guide in the design of ED for use with linear accelerators. In order to satisfy percent depth dose (PDD) characteristics and dose profile uniformity in water, the shape and thickness of Lucite® ED in the 9MeV beamline was iteratively optimized and then manufactured. The ED geometry consists of a truncated cone attached on top of a plane plate, with total central thickness of 1.0cm. The ED was placed on the lower most scraper of the electron applicator. The PDDs, profiles, and output factors were measured in water to validate the MC-based design.

Results
Skin doses with the EDs increased by 8–9%, compared to those of the 9MeV beam. The outputs with the EDs were 0.882 and 0.972 for 10 × 10 and 15 × 15cm2 cones, respectively, as compared to that of a conventional 9MeV beam for a 10 × 10cm2 cone. The X-ray contamination remained less than 1.5%. In-vivo measurements were also performed for three breast boost patients and showed close agreement with expected values.

Conclusions
The optimally designed ED in the 9MeV beamline provides breast conserving patients with a new energy option of 7MeV for boost of the shallow tumor bed. It would be an alternative to bolus and thus eliminate inconvenience and concern about the daily variation of bolus setup.
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBioMed Centralko_KR
dc.subjectElectron energy degraderko_KR
dc.subjectBreast boost irradiationko_KR
dc.subjectMonte Carlo simulationko_KR
dc.subjectLinear acceleratorko_KR
dc.titleDesign and evaluation of electron beam energy degraders for breast boost irradiationko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박종인-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor하성환-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김정인-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이현석-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이재기-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김일한-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor예성준-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13014-016-0686-7-
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).-
dc.date.updated2017-01-06T10:38:20Z-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share