Browse

The impact of generalized joint laxity (GJL) on the posterior neck pain, cervical disc herniation, and cervical disc degeneration in the cervical spine.
27503265

Cited 1 time in Web of Science Cited 1 time in Scopus
Authors
Lee, Sun-Mi; Oh, Su Chan; Yeom, Jin S.; Shin, Ji-Hoon; Park, Sam-Guk; Shin, Duk-Seop; Ahn, Myun-Whan; Lee, Gun Woo
Issue Date
2016-08-02
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Citation
SPINE JOURNAL Vol.16 No.12, pp. 1453-1458
Keywords
Cervical spineClinical outcomesDisc degenerationDisc herniationGeneral joint laxityPosterior neck pain
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT:Generalized joint laxity (GJL) can have a negative impact on lumbar spine pathology, including low back pain, disc degeneration, and disc herniation, but the relationship between GJL and cervical spine conditions remains unknown.PURPOSE:To investigate the relationship between GJL and cervical spine conditions, including the prevalence of posterior neck pain (PNP), cervical disc herniation (CDH), and cervical disc degeneration (CDD), in a young, active population.STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective 1:2 matched cohort (case-control) study from prospectively collected data PATIENT SAMPLE: Of a total of 1853 individuals reviewed, 73 individuals with GJL (study group, gruop A) and 146 without GJL (control group, Group B) were included in the study according to a 1:2 case-control matched design for age, sex, and body mass index.OUTCOME MEASURE:The primary outcome measure was the prevalence and intensity of PNP at enrollment based on a visual analogue scale score for pain. The secondary outcome measures were (1) clinical outcomes as measured with the neck disability index (NDI) and 12-item short form health survey (SF-12) at enrollment, and (2) radiological outcomes of CDH and CDD at enrollment.METHODS:We compared baseline data between groups. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed to compare the 2 groups in terms of the outcome measures.RESULTS:The prevalence and intensity of PNP were significantly greater in group A (patients with GJL) than in group B (patients without GJL) (prevalence: p=.02; intensity: p=.001). Clinical outcomes as measured with NDI and SF-12 did not differ significantly between groups. For radiologic outcomes, the prevalence of CDD was significantly greater in group A than in group B (p=.04), whereas the prevalence of CDH did not differ significantly between groups (p=.91).CONCLUSIONS:The current study revealed that GJL was closely related to the prevalence and intensity of PNP, suggesting that GJL may be a causative factor for PNP. In addition, GJL may contribute to the occurrence of CDD, but not CDH. Spine surgeons should screen for GJL in patientswith PNP and inform patients of its potential negative impact on disc degeneration of the cervical spine.
ISSN
1529-9430
Language
English
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10371/116952
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.08.009
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:
College of Medicine/School of Medicine (의과대학/대학원)Dept. of Medicine (의학과)Journal Papers (저널논문_의학과)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse