Publications

Detailed Information

Automated Hazard Identification for Construction Safety Management : 건설안전관리를 위한 자동화 위험원 식별

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor이현수-
dc.contributor.author김현수-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-13T06:33:42Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-13T06:33:42Z-
dc.date.issued2015-02-
dc.identifier.other000000025145-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/118643-
dc.description학위논문 (박사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 건축학과, 2015. 2. 이현수.-
dc.description.abstractThe National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) suggested several contributing factors to construction injuries and fatalities such as lack of hazard identification, lack of coordinates of activities, inexperienced workers, etc. Among these contributing factors, hazard identification is the first step of safety management. Construction safety management process mainly consists of hazard identification, risk assessment, and risk countermeasure. Although all three steps are important, identifying hazards becomes a fundamental step because unidentified hazards negate the risk assessment and the risk countermeasure process. As a result, an unidentified hazard can cause harm to construction workers who will remain unprotected until it is eliminated.

When workers start their works, they move and orient their activity areas. In this situation, a construction worker encounters a hazard during both moving and working. This study briefly classifies hazards, which a worker can encounter during moving and working, into two following categories: 1) activity-oriented hazard
-
dc.description.abstractand 2) non-activity-oriented hazard. These two types of hazards have different characteristics. Therefore, different approaches are taken to identify each type of hazard. In this regard, the objective of this disseratation develops a hazard identification system that can deal with two types of hazards.

Activity-oriented hazards can be identified by using past accident cases. To retrieve similar past accident cases and apply to corresponding site, indices for generating queries are firstly selected. The indices are extracted from building information model (BIM) and project management information system (PMIS). Based on extracted indices, queries for retrieving past similar accident cases can be generated. After generating queries, search engine retrieves cases and calculates similarity. The results include time and geometric information, as well. Also, they are automatically provided to the workers by using the push system.

The non-activity-oriented hazard system identifies potentially hazardous areas (PHA) on workers path by using the RTLS of workers and a building information model (BIM). The suggested system identifies PHA by using the deviation between the optimal route (the shortest path), which is determined by extracting nodes from BIM objects, and the real movement path of a worker, which is tracked by radio frequency identification. After this process, PHA can be divided into uncontrolled PHA and already controlled PHA. The information about uncontrolled PHA is provided to safety managers so they can establish proper safety countermeasures and manage the area.

Consequently, this study will contribute to enhance the efficiency of hazard identification of safety management by automated data processing procedure that can eliminate iterative and repetitive process. The automated procedure can identify a hazard quickly, so that the existing time a hazard without any countermeasure diminishes. It means that the time a worker exposed to risk decreases.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background 1
1.2 Problem Statement 3
1.3 Research Objectives and Scope 6
1.4 Dissertation Outline 9

Chapter 2 Background on Hazard Identification 13
2.1 Hazard and Safety Management 13
2.1.1 Definitions 13
2.1.2 Construction Accidents 17
2.2 Hazard Identification 24
2.2.1 Importance of Hazard Identification 24
2.2.2 Hazard Classification by Area Type 25
2.2.3 Hazard Identification by utilizing Information 30
2.3. Hazards on Activity Areas 33
2.3.1 Hazard Identification using Construction Information
and Accident Cases 34
2.3.2 Current Accident Case Retrieval Systems 37
2.4. Hazards on Movement Paths 39
2.4.1 Characteristics of Non-Activity Oriented
Hazard Identification 39
2.4.2 Current Non-Activity Oriented Hazard Identification 42
2.4.3 Location Sensing Methods 45
2.5 Summary 51

Chapter 3 Activity Oriented Hazard Identification 53
3.1 Requirements for Overcoming Limitations of
Current Accident Case Retrieval Systems 53
3.1.1 User and Usability 53
3.1.2 Query Generation and Providing Results 55
3.1.3 Retrieval Method 57
3.2 Indices for Information Retrieval 58
3.1.1 Extracting Indices 59
3.1.2 Classifying and Weighting Indices 61
3.1.3 Similarity Calculation 66
3.2 Data Source for System Development 75
3.3 Information Retrieval System Framework 78
3.4 Summary 82

Chapter 4 Non-Activity Oriented Hazard
Identification 85
4.1 Conceptual Model 86
4.2 Requirements for Developing Non-Activity Oriented
Hazard Identification 88
4.2.1 Verification of Assumptions 88
4.2.2 Required Databases 89
4.3 Accuracy Improvement Method for Workers
Location Sensing 101
4.3.1 Location Tracking Error Mitigation Algorithms 101
4.3.2 Application of Assistant Tags 112
4.3.3 Location Tracking System Development 118
4.4 Non-Activity Oriented Hazard Identification
System Framework 123
4.4.1 Module Ⅰ: Unidentified Hazardous Area Identification 124
4.4.2 Module Ⅱ: Filtering Hazardous Area 131
4.4.3 Module Ⅲ: Monitoring and Output Generation 133
4.4.4 Non-Activity Oriented Hazard Identification System
Development 135
4.5 Summary 140

Chapter 5 Hazard Identification System Validation
using Case Study 143
5.1 Validation Strategy 143
5.2 Activity Oriented Hazard Identification Validation 144
5.2.1 Case Study 145
5.2.2 Comparison with Accident Case Retrieval System 148
5.2.3 Usability Validation 152
5.3 Non-Activity Oriented Hazard Identification Validation 156
5.3.1 Accuracy of Location Sensing 157
5.3.2 Comparison with Inspection of Safety Manager 168
5.3.3 Validation of Accuracy of Non-Activity Oriented
Hazard Identification 169
5.4 Summary 174

Chapter 6 Conclusions 177
6.1 Research Results and Contributions 177
6.2 Limitations and Future Research 181

Bibliography 185

Appendices 205
Appendix A: Glossary of Acronyms 206
Appendix B: Accident Case Sample Data 208
Appendix C: The Source Code of Non-activity Oriented
Hazard Identification System 232

Abstract (Korean) 267
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent5078091 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subject위험원 식별-
dc.subject안전관리-
dc.subject정보검색-
dc.subject자동화 데이터 수집-
dc.subject실시간 위치추적 시스템-
dc.subject.ddc690-
dc.titleAutomated Hazard Identification for Construction Safety Management-
dc.title.alternative건설안전관리를 위한 자동화 위험원 식별-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorHyunsoo Kim-
dc.description.degreeDoctor-
dc.citation.pagesxii, 269-
dc.contributor.affiliation공과대학 건축학과-
dc.date.awarded2015-02-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share