Browse

The Critical Assessment of Heterogeneous Outcome of CEO Hubris

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor박철순-
dc.contributor.author박현준-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-13T07:25:01Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-13T07:25:01Z-
dc.date.issued2014-02-
dc.identifier.other000000017113-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/119346-
dc.description학위논문 (박사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 경영학과, 2014. 2. 박철순.-
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation aims to examine and explore the research area of CEO hubris. Research from the institutional theory explains the homogenous aspects of organization, however, lacks the explanations of heterogeneous behavior. This paper attempts to explain the heterogeneous behavior through CEO hubris. Thus, I conducted one empirical study and one review paper based on CEO hubris.

First study is based CEO hubris and institutional theory through corporate social responsibility. It argues that CEO hubris does not follow the norm on corporate social responsibility due to arrogant and simple minded behavior of CEO hubris characteristics. Rather than following the norm of corporate social responsibility from institutional pressure, the degree of corporate social responsibility from CEO hubris will either be very high or very low. Furthermore, internal control mechanisms using ratios of outside board of directors and foreign ownership as a moderating variable is used for this research.

Second study is a review paper based on CEO hubris, overconfidence, CEO celebrity, and narcissism. This paper attempts to clarify the confusion of similar perspectives by exploring and investigating a comprehensive review of the related theories by looking into the origin, definition, cause and outcome.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsOVERALL INTRODUCTION………………………………………1

STUDY 1
CEO HUBRIS AND INSTITUTIONAL PRESSURE:
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ……………………7
Abstract………………………………………………………………4
Introduction …………………………………………………………5
Theory and Hypothesis…………………………………………10
Method………………………………………………………………23
Results………………………………………………………………30
Discussion…………………………………………………………33
Conclusion…………………………………………………………37

STUDY 2
REVIEW PAPER:
ANTECEDENTS AND OUTCOMES OF CEO HUBRIS ……38
Abstract.……………………………………………………………39
Introduction ………………………………………………………40
CEO Hubris: The Phenomenon………………………………42
Overconfidence, CEO Celebrity and Narcissism………51
Limitations and Future Research……………………………71
Conclusion…………………………………………………………73

OVERALL CONCLUSION…………………………………………74
REFERENCES………………………………………………………77
국문초록……………………………………………………………107

Tables

Descriptive Statistics and correlations of Study...………96
Results of Deviation Median Regression Analysis………97
Results of KEJI Regression Analysis ………………………98
Antecedents and Outcomes of CEO Hubris...................99
Antecedents and Outcomes of Overconfidence…………100
Antecedents and Outcomes of CEO Celebrity……………101
Antecedents and Outcomes of Narcissism…................102


Figures

Research Model…………………………………………………105
Summary Model of Antecedents and Outcomes of CEO Hubris………………………………………………………………106
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent876843 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectCEO hubris-
dc.subjectInstitutional theory-
dc.subjectCorporate Social Responsibility-
dc.subjectand Corporate Governance-
dc.subject.ddc658-
dc.titleThe Critical Assessment of Heterogeneous Outcome of CEO Hubris-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorPark Hyun Sam Jun-
dc.description.degreeDoctor-
dc.citation.pagesiv-
dc.contributor.affiliation경영대학 경영학과-
dc.date.awarded2014-02-
Appears in Collections:
College of Business Administration/Business School (경영대학/대학원)Dept. of Business Administration (경영학과)Theses (Ph.D. / Sc.D._경영학과)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse