Publications

Detailed Information

2D Numerical Simulations of Bubble Flow in Straight Pipes : 직관내 기포의 흐름에 대한 2차원 수치 모의

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisorVan Thinh Nguyen-
dc.contributor.author이태윤-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-14T04:19:04Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-01-
dc.date.issued2016-08-
dc.identifier.other000000136434-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/124334-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 건설환경공학부, 2016. 8. Van Thinh Nguyen.-
dc.description.abstractThe main purpose of water aeration is to maintain healthy levels of dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration. Water aeration involves the injection of air or air bubbles into water treatment reservoir commonly through pipes. Fine bubble has higher mass transfer when its diameter gets smaller and smaller bubbles are more capable of enhancing DO concentration level. Two-phase flow consisting of air and water inside horizontal pipe with small diameter is capable of transferring fine bubbles into a body of water and its mechanism should be clearly understood for better system designing. Nevertheless, there are only a few studies that deal with the relationship between mathematical characteristics of two-phase flow inside horizontal pipe and DO concentration level. The main objective of this study is to perform 2-dimensional two-phase simulations inside horizontal pipe using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) OpenFOAM (Open source Field Operation And Manipulation) tools to examine the effect of pipe wall shear stress on bubble size, which is the major factor effecting DO concentration level. Under different initial conditions, two-phase numerical simulations using Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) combined with Eulerian-Eulerian method were performed to compute the axial Sauter Mean Diameter (SMD) of bubbles, water velocity, and wall shear stress within a 13.4 m long horizontal pipe with 50.3 mm inner diameter. The coalescence and breakage of bubbles caused by random collisions were considered during the simulations to predict the values of axial SMD. The water velocity and SMD were validated against the experimental data of Kocamustafaogullari and Wang (1991) and the relative errors ranged from 4% to 15% and 8% to 30%, respectively. Two additional experimental results obtained by Yin et al. (2012) and Water Supply Engineering Laboratory (WSEL) at SNU were gathered. These experiments deal with two-phase horizontal pipe flow under different configurations and DO concentration level. Their results were compared with the results obtained by Kocamustafaogullari and Wang (1991) and the aforementioned numerical analysis to determine the effect of pipe wall shear stress on bubble diameter and DO concentration level. As a result, the increase in pipe wall shear stress decreases bubble size and increases DO concentration level. By comparing the results and making links between them, it was concluded that the pipe wall shear stress plays a key role in breaking up the bubbles.-
dc.description.tableofcontentsCHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 General Introduction 1
1.2 Objective and Necessities 2

CHAPTER 2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 3
2.1 Previous Studies 3
2.1.1 Two-Phase Flow 3
2.1.2 Bubble Coalescence and Breakup 3
2.1.3 Bubble Diameter and DO Concentration Level 4
2.1.4 Two-Phase Flow Pipe Wall Shear Stress 4

CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGIES 6
3.1 RANS Governing Equations 6
3.1.1 RANS Combined with Eulerian-Eulerian 6
3.2 Turbulence Model: k-ε Model 7
3.2.1 Dispersed k-ε Model 7
3.3 Bubble Coalescence 9
3.3.1 Mechanisms of Bubble Coalescence 9
3.3.2 Turbulent Collision Rate 10
3.3.3 Collision Efficiency 11
3.4 Bubble Breakup 12
3.4.1 Mechanisms of Bubble Breakup 12
3.4.2 Breakup Efficiency 13
3.5 Sauter Mean Diameter (d32) 15
3.5.1 Interfacial Area Transport Equation (IATE) Model 15
3.5.2 One-Group ai Transport Equation 16
3.6 Wall Shear Stress 17
3.6.1 Circular Pipe Wall Shear Stress 17

CHAPTER 4. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP & DATA 25
4.1 Kocamustafaogullari and Wang (1991) 25
4.1.1 Experimental Setup & Procedure 25
4.1.2 Experimental Results 28
4.2 Yin et al. (2012) Numerical Model 30
4.2.1 Experimental Setup & Procedure 30
4.2.2 Experimental & Numerical Findings 32
4.3 Dissolved Oxygen Concentration Measurements 34
4.3.1 Experimental Setup & Procedure 34
4.3.2 Experimental Results 37

CHAPTER 5. NUMERICAL SIMULATION 39
5.1 Kocamustafaogullari and Wang (1991) 39
5.1.1 Computational Domain 39
5.1.2 Simulation Setup and Boundary Conditions 40
5.1.3 Simulation Results 41
5.2 Water Supplying Engineering Lab: Simulation 47
5.2.1 Simulation Results 47

CHAPTER 6. DISCUSSION 50

CHAPTER 7. CONCLUSION 60

CHAPTER 8. REFERENCES 61

초록 67
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1765129 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectTwo-Phase-
dc.subjectOpenFOAM-
dc.subjectDO Concentration-
dc.subjectBubble Coalescence and Breakup-
dc.subjectSauter Mean Diameter-
dc.subject.ddc624-
dc.title2D Numerical Simulations of Bubble Flow in Straight Pipes-
dc.title.alternative직관내 기포의 흐름에 대한 2차원 수치 모의-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.citation.pages67-
dc.contributor.affiliation공과대학 건설환경공학부-
dc.date.awarded2016-08-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share