Publications
Detailed Information
Gift through Related Party Transaction and Gift Tax Act
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 황이석 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김진한 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-14T05:10:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-14T05:10:10Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014-02 | - |
dc.identifier.other | 000000016917 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/124469 | - |
dc.description | 학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 경영학과, 2014. 2. 황이석. | - |
dc.description.abstract | I examine the gift through related party transaction (Gift-through-RPT). I measure the magnitude of Gift-through-RPT using two components: the amount of related party sales for gift (RPS-for-gift) and the operating margin ratio of the RPS-for-gift. I find that the group owners relatives equity holding in unlisted related companies is the main determinant for RPS-for-gift and that the operating margin ratio of the RPS-for-gift is not different from similar transactions with the third parties. When I classify related party sales (RPS) into RPS between parent and subsidiaries and RPS between non-parent-subsidiaries relationship, I find that RPS between non-parent-subsidiaries relationship is more adequate to measure RPS-for-gift than the aggregated RPS. For additional test, I compare the difference in the amount of RPS-for-gift and the operating margin ratio of the RPS-for-gift between 2008 ~ 2011 and 2012, to see the effect of the enforcement of the article 45(3) in Inheritance and Gift Tax Act (the Gift Tax Act regarding Gift-through-RPT), effective in 2012. I find the Gift Tax Act is not effective in diminishing the amount of RPS-for-gift as well as the operating margin ratio of the RPS-for-gift in 2012. | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents
1. Introduction ………………………………….………….1 2. Institutional Background and Related Gift Tax ………... 6 3. Literature Review …………………………………….... 9 3.1. Two Alternative Hypotheses on RPTs …………... 9 3.2. Literature on RPTs ………………………….........11 4. Hypothesis and Research Design ……………………... 14 4.1. Main Test …………………………………….......14 4.2. Additional Test – Effect of Gift Tax Act ……….. 23 5. Sample Selection and Descriptive Statistics …………... 25 6. Empirical Results …………………………………….…32 6.1. Main Test Result ……………………………....…32 6.2. Additional Test Result – Effect of Gift Tax Act …41 7. Conclusions and Discussions ………………………….. 43 | - |
dc.format | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.extent | 478718 bytes | - |
dc.format.medium | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 대학원 | - |
dc.subject | gift | - |
dc.subject | related party transaction | - |
dc.subject | related party sales | - |
dc.subject | operating margin ratio | - |
dc.subject | RPT | - |
dc.subject | parent | - |
dc.subject | subsidiaries | - |
dc.subject | relative shareholder | - |
dc.subject | gift tax | - |
dc.subject.ddc | 658 | - |
dc.title | Gift through Related Party Transaction and Gift Tax Act | - |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Kim, Jin-Han | - |
dc.description.degree | Master | - |
dc.citation.pages | iv, 50 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliation | 경영대학 경영학과 | - |
dc.date.awarded | 2014-02 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.