Publications

Detailed Information

Gift through Related Party Transaction and Gift Tax Act

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor황이석-
dc.contributor.author김진한-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-14T05:10:10Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-14T05:10:10Z-
dc.date.issued2014-02-
dc.identifier.other000000016917-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/124469-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 경영학과, 2014. 2. 황이석.-
dc.description.abstractI examine the gift through related party transaction (Gift-through-RPT). I measure the magnitude of Gift-through-RPT using two components: the amount of related party sales for gift (RPS-for-gift) and the operating margin ratio of the RPS-for-gift. I find that the group owners relatives equity holding in unlisted related companies is the main determinant for RPS-for-gift and that the operating margin ratio of the RPS-for-gift is not different from similar transactions with the third parties. When I classify related party sales (RPS) into RPS between parent and subsidiaries and RPS between non-parent-subsidiaries relationship, I find that RPS between non-parent-subsidiaries relationship is more adequate to measure RPS-for-gift than the aggregated RPS. For additional test, I compare the difference in the amount of RPS-for-gift and the operating margin ratio of the RPS-for-gift between 2008 ~ 2011 and 2012, to see the effect of the enforcement of the article 45(3) in Inheritance and Gift Tax Act (the Gift Tax Act regarding Gift-through-RPT), effective in 2012. I find the Gift Tax Act is not effective in diminishing the amount of RPS-for-gift as well as the operating margin ratio of the RPS-for-gift in 2012.-
dc.description.tableofcontentsTable of Contents

1. Introduction ………………………………….………….1
2. Institutional Background and Related Gift Tax ………... 6
3. Literature Review …………………………………….... 9
3.1. Two Alternative Hypotheses on RPTs …………... 9
3.2. Literature on RPTs ………………………….........11
4. Hypothesis and Research Design ……………………... 14
4.1. Main Test …………………………………….......14
4.2. Additional Test – Effect of Gift Tax Act ……….. 23
5. Sample Selection and Descriptive Statistics …………... 25
6. Empirical Results …………………………………….…32
6.1. Main Test Result ……………………………....…32
6.2. Additional Test Result – Effect of Gift Tax Act …41
7. Conclusions and Discussions ………………………….. 43
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent478718 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectgift-
dc.subjectrelated party transaction-
dc.subjectrelated party sales-
dc.subjectoperating margin ratio-
dc.subjectRPT-
dc.subjectparent-
dc.subjectsubsidiaries-
dc.subjectrelative shareholder-
dc.subjectgift tax-
dc.subject.ddc658-
dc.titleGift through Related Party Transaction and Gift Tax Act-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorKim, Jin-Han-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.citation.pagesiv, 50-
dc.contributor.affiliation경영대학 경영학과-
dc.date.awarded2014-02-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share