Publications

Detailed Information

Sino-African Cooperation Revisited: A Comparative Analysis of Chinese Aid in Sub-Saharan Africa : 중국-아프리카 협력 재고: 사하라 사막 이남의 아프리카에 중국 대외원조의 비교분석

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor김태균-
dc.contributor.author연현모-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-14T07:00:15Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-14T07:00:15Z-
dc.date.issued2014-08-
dc.identifier.other000000020743-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/126206-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 국제대학원 : 국제학과, 2014. 8. 김태균.-
dc.description.abstract10년 전부터 중국 대외 원조가 아프리카보다 상당히 성장하고 있습니다. 최근에는 영국과 미국을 능가하고 있습니다. 중국 정부가 정부 개발 원조 수치를 제공하지 않아서 서양 기부자 우려로 이어지고 있습니다. 해외 원조 체제를 개발하는 경우 , 중국은 세 가지 옵션 을 가졌습니다 : 기존의 지원 구조를 따라OECD DAC 가입, OECD DAC 를 회피 하지만 원조 이념과 양식 수긍, 그리고 OECD DAC의 것과 동일한 메커니즘을 구현하거나 자신의 길이 있습니다. 중국은 지속적으로 OECD DAC 에 가입하고 기존의 지원 구조를 가입 요구를 거부하고 , 세 번째 옵션 을 선택했습니다.

내 연구의 목적은 중국이 자신의 적절한 역사적 맥락에서 중국의 원조 정책을 배치하여 이 " 세 번째 방법 "을 선택한 이유를 설명하는 것 입니다 . 나는 중국의 지원 정책이 오늘날 대부분 1960년 첫 번째 공식 지원 프로젝트로 거슬러 역사적 과정의 결과라고 주장합니다. 현재까지 초기 냉전 시대 중국의 원조 정책의 역사적 발전을 추적하여 , 나는 국가의 이익이 새로운 " 베이징 컨센서스 " 의 일환으로 새 중국 기반의 원조 패러다임에 진화하였다고 봅니다. 특히 , " 합리적 " 비 조건부 의 정책은 기존의 지원 에서 근본적인 차이 중 하나입니다.
-
dc.description.abstractChinese foreign aid to Africa has increased substantially within the past decade, along with Chinas share of African trade, which recently outpaced that of Britain and the United States. Official development assistance figures are not provided by the Chinese government, leading to concerns by Western donors. When developing its overseas aid regime, China had three options: follow the existing aid architecture and join the OECD DAC, sidestep the OECD DAC but implement aid ideologies, modalities, and mechanisms identical to those of the OECD DAC, or find its own way. China has chosen the third option, consistently rejecting demands to join the OECD DAC and join the existing aid architecture.
The purpose of my research is to explain why China chose this third way by placing Chinas aid policies in their proper historical context. I argue that Chinese aid policies to Africa today are largely the result of a historical process that dates back to the first official aid project in Guinea in 1960. By tracing the historical evolution of Chinas aid policies from the early Cold War period to the present, I hope to show how evolving national interests have resulted in a new, Chinese-based aid paradigm as part of the new Beijing Consensus, and specifically, the policy of rational non-conditionality is one of the fundamental differences from existing aid paradigms.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsACKNOWLEDGEMENTS__________________________________________________________7

ABSTRACT__________________________________________________________________8

TABLES AND FIGURES_______________________________________________________12

I. INTRODUCTION__________________________________________________________14
1. THE RISE OF CHINA IN AFRICA__________________________________14
1.1. African frustration with the Bretton Woods institutions and Western donors_______________________________________14
1.2. China as an alternative______________________________________________15
2. RESEARCH QUESTION____________________________________________16
3. HYPOTHESIS___________________________________________________17
4. HIGHLIGHT OF LITERATURE REVIEW_______________________________18

II. LITERATURE REVIEW____________________________________________________20
1. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK________________________________________20
1.1. Realist framework___________________________________20
1.2. Neorealism__________________________________________22
1.3. Revisionist framework_______________________________23
1.4. Aid conditionality as rational______________________25
2. EXISTING AID ARCHITECTURE____________________________________33
2.1. ODA vs. aid?____________________________________33
2.2. Overview of present-day donor fragmentation_________36
2.3. OECD DAC____________________________________________50
3. CHINESE AID ARCHITECTURE_____________________________________53
3.1. Overview of major aid organs________________________53
3.2. Chinese aid flows___________________________________57
3.3. Chinese aid policies________________________________61

III. METHODOLOGY_________________________________________________________64
1. RESEARCH DESIGN______________________________________________64
2. METHODS AND DATA COLLECTION__________________________________65
3. AVAILABILITY OF DATA_________________________________________66

IV. CASE STUDIES________________________________________________________67
1. TANZAM RAILWAY PROJECT IN TANZANIA AND ZAMBIA (1967-1975)____67
1.1. Country profile_____________________________________67
1.2. Tanzam Railway______________________________________72
2. CHINESE-GHANIAN COOEPRATION (1964 – 2000s)____________________82 2.1. Country profile_____________________________________82
2.2. 54 years of friendship______________________________88
2.3 Bui Dam______________________________________________89
3. CHINESE-ANGOLAN COOPERATION (1960 - 2000s)___________________92
3.1. Country profile_____________________________________92
3.2. A cautious relationship_____________________________98
3.3. Trouble in Angola?_________________________________100

V. DISCUSSION___________________________________________________________105
1. NON-CONDITIONALITY__________________________________________105
2. NON-INTERVENTION____________________________________________108
3. A NEW FORM OF SOUTH-SOUTH COOPERATION_______________________111
4. RESULTS_____________________________________________________114
5. SUMMARY OF KEY FACTS________________________________________119

CONCLUSION______________________________________________________________120

REFERENCES______________________________________________________________123

ABSTRACT IN KOREAN______________________________________________________129
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent2435457 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subject정부 개발 원조-
dc.subject대외 원조-
dc.subject남남협력-
dc.subjectODA-
dc.subjectForeign Aid-
dc.subjectSouth-South Cooperation-
dc.subject.ddc327-
dc.titleSino-African Cooperation Revisited: A Comparative Analysis of Chinese Aid in Sub-Saharan Africa-
dc.title.alternative중국-아프리카 협력 재고: 사하라 사막 이남의 아프리카에 중국 대외원조의 비교분석-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.citation.pages123-
dc.contributor.affiliation국제대학원 국제학과-
dc.date.awarded2014-08-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share