Browse

Do Donors Allocate Infrastructure Aid in Response to Recipient Needs?
인프라 원조와 수원국 필요 간의 관계에 대한 연구

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisorGeun Lee-
dc.contributor.author이연우-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-19T04:25:04Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-19T04:25:04Z-
dc.date.issued2014-02-
dc.identifier.other000000018794-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/129219-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 국제대학원 : 국제학과(국제협력전공), 2014. 2. 이근.-
dc.description.abstractThis study examines whether infrastructure aid responds to needs specific to the infrastructure sector. Since both supply and demand of infrastructure are related with growth, this study identifies needs in supply and demand. These include infrastructure quantity and quality, geographical concerns, and ethnic fractionalization at the supply side-
dc.description.abstractand governance and macroeconomic stability at the demand side. Controlling for donor interests, infrastructure aid, by sector and donor, is regressed on the needs using the Tobit model.

The findings of this study show that while infrastructure aid, in general, was responsive to infrastructure quantity, ethnic fractionalization, and macroeconomic stability, it was less so in infrastructure quality, geographical considerations, and governance. When divided into specific sectors, the need responsiveness becomes substantially weaker, and aid is responsive to either none or the wrong side of needs. Analyzing differences in donors, this study supports previous research on disaggregate aid allocation that multilateral aid was not any more responsive to need, but in fact less so. Good performers with respect to need include Japan, Germany, Ireland, Korea, Luxembourg, Spain, Sweden, and the U.K., while France, Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland performed poorly.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsI. Introduction
II. Literature Review
i. Definition of Infrastructure
ii. Infrastructure Aid
iii. Aid Allocation
III. Theoretical Background
i. Needs for Infrastructure Supply
ii. Needs for Infrastructure Demand
iii. Sector and Donor Differences
IV. Data and Method
V. Analysis
i. Total Infrastructure Aid
ii. Infrastructure Aid by Sector
iii. Infrastructure Aid by Donor
VI. Conclusion
VII. References
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent915759 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectforeign aid-
dc.subjectinfrastructure-
dc.subjectrecipient need-
dc.subjectaid allocation-
dc.subjectresponsiveness-
dc.subject.ddc327-
dc.titleDo Donors Allocate Infrastructure Aid in Response to Recipient Needs?-
dc.title.alternative인프라 원조와 수원국 필요 간의 관계에 대한 연구-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.citation.pages58-
dc.contributor.affiliation국제대학원 국제학과(국제협력전공)-
dc.date.awarded2014-02-
Appears in Collections:
Graduate School of International Studies (국제대학원)Dept. of International Studies (국제학과)Theses (Master's Degree_국제학과)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse