Publications

Detailed Information

주거·업무기능의 혼용 행태에 따른 이용자 특성

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor최막중-
dc.contributor.author변지은-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-19T07:22:26Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-19T07:22:26Z-
dc.date.issued2014-02-
dc.identifier.other000000018778-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/129884-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 환경대학원 : 환경계획학과, 2014. 2. 최막중.-
dc.description.abstractAs we enter the modern, technology development of mobile communications and digital devices is changing people's lifestyles. Gradually widening spatial extent and area that can act, complex life is made ​​possible. This feature, as well as traditional residential housing have indicates that business function. Modern people needs spaces that reflect lifestyle and tendencies as such complex and integrated residential living as well as living up to the task.
However, in the existing urban plan, a clear separation between housing and work space in land use planning does not consider the characteristics of modern people. Awareness of these issues, this study will give show analyzing the characteristics about workers according to mixed-use of home and office function. Research data were collected by KOSIS. Research data were called Life Time Research during 2009. Number of samples are 7,072 except people under 19 years old, students, no working people, and some workers not to meet purpose of this study.
Depender variable were 3 groups according to the behavior to choose place to work between home and out(office or ect.)
-
dc.description.abstractgroup[work at home], group[work at home&out], group[work at out]. And another Depender variable were the amount of time to work at home of 3 groups. Independent variable were the characteristics about workers-
dc.description.abstractpersonal characteristics(age, sex, having preschool children or not, education), family characteristics(family size, housing type, area of housing, region to live), economical characteristics(job, position, income, time of commuting, week or weekend to work).
Through Multinomial logistic model, the characteristics of group[work at home] are strongly having professional job, free lancer and working on weekend compare to group[work at out]. Through Tobit model, compared to group[work at out], the characteristics of group[work at home&out] are woman, elderly, high-education, living in wide area of housing, commuting for a long time, owner, administrator, officer, salse of types of jobs and working on weekend including the characteristics of group[work at home].
As a result, the characteristics about workers affect to choice place to work
-
dc.description.abstracthome or out or both of all-
dc.description.abstractas well as amount of time to work at home. The characteristics are age, sex, education, area of housing, job, position, week or weekend to work. And between 3 groups, their characteristics have differences each other.

As provide basic cross section about status of workers according to mixed-use of home and office function, goal of this empirical study has attention about mixed-use of home and office function and providing basic data to decide direction of city planning. Therefore, these results show that what characteristics of workers would affect behavior to work at home or out, there are significant to provide data to reflect to diverse & flexible housing policy and mixed land use planing.
However, because job category of data in this study was not classified in detail, this study has some limits not to analyze the characteristics of types of jobs clearly.
-
dc.description.tableofcontents제 1 장 서론 1
1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
2. 연구의 내용 및 구성 2


제 2 장 이론 및 선행연구 고찰 5
1. 토지이용 복합 및 주거·업무 혼용공간에 관한 고찰 5
1) 토지이용의 복합화 및 다양성에 관한 고찰 7
2) 주거·업무 혼용공간에 관한 선행연구 7
2. 재택근무의 이론 및 선행연구 9
1) 재택근무의 개념 및 배경 9
2) 재택근무에 관한 선행연구 15


제 3 장 분석자료 및 모형 23
1. 분석자료 23
2. 분석변수의 정의와 측정 25
1) 종속변수 25
2) 독립변수 28
3) 모형 및 변수의 정리 30
3. 분석모형 32
1) 다항 로지스틱 모형 32
2) 토빗 모형 33
3) 반로그 모형 36


제 4 장 실증분석 37
1. 기술통계분석 37
1) 개인적 특성 41
2) 가구적 특성 45
3) 경제적 특성 46
4) 생활 특성 48
5) 소결 49
2. 다항로지스틱분석, 주거·업무기능 혼용형태에 따른 이용자 특성 49
3. 토빗분석, 주거·업무기능 혼용형태와 근무 시간량에 따른 이용자 특성 53
4. 소결 56


제 5 장 결론 57
1. 연구결과 요약 및 정책적 함의 57
2. 연구의 한계 및 향후 연구방향 59


■ 참고문헌 60
■ Abstract 63
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1125790 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoko-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subject라이프스타일-
dc.subject주거업무혼용-
dc.subject재택근무-
dc.subject복합토지이용-
dc.subject용도지역-
dc.subject다항로짓분석-
dc.subject토빗분석-
dc.subject.ddc711-
dc.title주거·업무기능의 혼용 행태에 따른 이용자 특성-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.citation.pages65-
dc.contributor.affiliation환경대학원 환경계획학과-
dc.date.awarded2014-02-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share