Publications

Detailed Information

Evaluation of the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM Experimental Resin Block Restorations : Experimental composite block을 이용한 CAD-CAM 수복물의 적합도에 대한 평가

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors

박소현

Advisor
백승후
Major
치의학대학원 치의학과
Issue Date
2015-02
Publisher
서울대학교 대학원
Keywords
CAD/CAM restorationResin nano ceramic blockLava ultimateMarginal gapInternal gap
Description
학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 치의학대학원 : 치의학과, 2015. 2. 백승후.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare marginal and internal fit between Lava Ultimate (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) and an experimental nano-hybrid composite resin block (Vericom Co., Anyang, Korea) in two preparation types, single crown and inlay with one cusp capping design.
Extracted maxillary and mandibular teeth were prepared as single crown and inlay. After preparation, abutment impression was taken and poured with epoxy resin to make replicas (n = 20). 3M Lava ultimate blocks (LU) and Experimental Resin blocks (EB) were milled using CEREC MC XL with the CEREC 3D system (CEREC AC, software package 4.00, Bensheim, Germany) to construct 10 crowns and inlays for each group. The milling parameters were set as 140 ㎛ for spacer and 50 ㎛ for marginal width. After milling, sample restorations were assessed for proper fit and cemented with resin material (RelyX™ Ultimate Clicker™ Adhesive Resin Cement, 3M ESPE). To measure marginal gap, milled restorations were examined under dental surgical microscope with scale under 40× magnifications, captured images with digital camera and measured using Adobe Photoshop. For internal gap, specimens were embedded in acrylic resin and sectioned bucco-lingually and mesio-distally with water cooled low speed diamond blade in 0.5 mm thickness (n = 20) and evaluated with cement gap was evaluated. The statistical analysis was performed for significant differences of marginal and internal gap between different restoration design and different restoration material.
In our study, the means of crown marginal gap before cementation were significantly lower than after cementation (p < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference at inlay groups. And the mean values of marginal gap between EB and LU showed no significant difference regardless of restoration design. Internal gap of LU inlay was significantly lower than EB inlay (p < 0.05), but no internal gap difference was found in the internal gaps between crown groups.
Language
English
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/130792
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share