Publications

Detailed Information

Geographical Distribution and Regional Disparity of Suicide Risks in Korea, 2008-2012 : 국내 자살위험의 지리적 분포와 지역적 불균등에 관한 연구, 2008-2012

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor박기호-
dc.contributor.author엄영섭-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-19T12:02:39Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-19T12:02:39Z-
dc.date.issued2015-02-
dc.identifier.other000000025962-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/134059-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 지리학과, 2015. 2. 박기호.-
dc.description.abstractThe suicide problem has been grave national public health issue. This study aims to explore geographical distribution of suicide risks in regional scale and to measure the regional disparity.
The study object is complete suicide, so the national mortality data, cause of death statistics, was used for this study. From the explorative analysis, significant differences of suicide rates among different sex and age strata were found. The associations between categorical socio-demographic variables and violent suicide means selection, holiday effect, and copycat effect were identified with log-linear model.
Spatio-temporally comparable suicide risks and statistically robust relative risks were estimated by direct standardization and Bayesian estimation, respectively. Various visualizing techniques, such as building legend scheme, statistical significance mapping, and cartogram, were applied for mapping the risks and the results were produced with interactive maps, utilizing the interface of Google Maps and Google Earth. In metropolitan areas, bulls eye pattern was found. On the national scale, low suicide risks in southern areas were clearly distinguished with high risks in northern parts. Taking into account statistical significance, the regions with high relative risks were mainly distributed in Gangwon, Chungnam, and Chungbuk.
The regional disparity of suicide risks was measured with spatial dissimilarity index, which integrates two divergent dimensions: aspatial unevenness and spatial clustering. First, the characteristics of the distribution of suicide risks were measured in each dimension. Regional unevenness was measured with aspatial inequality indices and global/local spatial autocorrelation was explored with spatial cluster analysis. The regional inequality decreased from 2008 to 2010, and increased consistently after 2010. Moreover, strong spatial autocorrelation was observed throughout the study period. Based on these observations, the global spatial dissimilarity index was computed with Gaussian kernel. It did not make any change in the pattern of temporal variation derived with aspatial measures due to the stable spatio-temporal distribution of suicide risks. However, when the administrative units are ignored with kernel smoothing, temporal pattern changed, which implies the possibility of MAUP. Lastly, cumulative frequency legend and 3D mapping was applied to suicide atlas to reflect the information on the computed regional disparity of suicide risks.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsⅠ. Introduction 1
1.1. Background 1
1.2. Objectives 2
1.3. Organization of Chapters 3
Ⅱ. Literature Review 4
2.1. Medical Geography and Disease Mapping 4
2.2. Geographical Pattern of Suicide 6
2.3. Measurement of Regional Inequality 7
2.3.1. Inequality Measures in Health Studies 7
2.3.2. Spatial Measures for Regional Inequality 8
Ⅲ. Research Methodology 10
3.1. Categorical Data Analysis 10
3.1.1. Contingency Table Analysis 10
3.1.1.1. Test of independence 10
3.1.1.2. Measures of association 11
3.1.2. Log-linear Model for Multi-way Contingency Table 12
3.2. Disease Mapping for Representing Ecological Risk 14
3.2.1. Age-sex Standardization of Rates 14
3.2.2. Bayesian Smoothing Technique 16
3.2.3. Cartogram 19
3.3. Measurement of Regional Inequality 20
3.3.1. A-spatial Measurement of Regional Disparity 20
3.3.1.1. Extended Gini index 20
3.3.1.2. Generalized Entropy Index 20
3.3.1.3. Dissimilarity Index 20
3.3.2. Spatial Cluster Analysis 22
3.3.2.1. Global Detection of Cluster 22
3.3.2.2. Local Detection of Cluster 23
3.3.3. Spatial Dissimilarity Indices 24
Ⅳ. Analysis and Results 27
4.1. Explorative Analysis on Suicide Mortality Data 27
4.1.1. Data Description 27
4.1.2. Descriptive Statistics 30
4.1.3. Contingency Table Analysis on Suicide Data 35
4.1.3.1. Violent suicide means 36
4.1.3.2. Holiday effect 41
4.1.3.3. Copycat effect 44
4.2. Geographical Distribution of Suicide Risks 46
4.2.1. Standardization of Suicide Rates 46
4.2.1.1. Directly Standardized Suicide Rates 46
4.2.1.2. SMR of Suicide 50
4.2.2. Bayesian Smoothed Relative Risks 52
4.2.3. Cartogram and Web-publishing 58
4.2.3.1. Cartogram of Suicide 58
4.2.3.2. Interactive Atlas of Suicide 60
4.3. Regional Disparity of Suicide Risks 62
4.3.1. Aspatial Regional Unevenness of Suicide 62
4.3.2. Spatial Clustering of Suicide 67
4.3.3. Spatial Dissimilarity of Suicide 72
Ⅴ. Conclusion 78
References 81
Appendix 87
국문 초록 97
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent5948967 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectsuicide risk-
dc.subjectrelative-risk estimation-
dc.subjectsuicide atlas-
dc.subjectregional disparity-
dc.subjectspatial cluster-
dc.subjectspatial dissimilarity-
dc.subject.ddc910-
dc.titleGeographical Distribution and Regional Disparity of Suicide Risks in Korea, 2008-2012-
dc.title.alternative국내 자살위험의 지리적 분포와 지역적 불균등에 관한 연구, 2008-2012-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.citation.pagesⅶ, 98-
dc.contributor.affiliation사회과학대학 지리학과-
dc.date.awarded2015-02-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share