Publications

Detailed Information

Specificity of surround interaction for global motion directionality in awake monkey V1

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor이춘길-
dc.contributor.author김은영-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-19T12:21:13Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-19T12:21:13Z-
dc.date.issued2014-02-
dc.identifier.other000000018612-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/134364-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 심리학과, 2014. 2. 이춘길.-
dc.description.abstractNeurons of the primary visual cortex (V1) process visual information presented within the classical receptive field (cRF), and this local information is thought to be integrated with that outside the cRF to recover global visual features in later stages. However, it has been known that even in the V1, neuronal activity is modulated by stimuli outside the cRF. In line with this, it was reported that V1 neurons are modulated by temporal interval of spatiotemporal stimulus sequence extending beyond the cRF (Kim et al., 2012), suggesting that V1 neurons participate in processing stimulus motion extending beyond the cRF – global motion.
In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that V1 neurons have directional preference for global motion extending beyond the cRF, and that this is based on fine-tuned surround interaction. Specifically, we measured global directional preference with a sequence of two focal stationary Gabor stimuli
-
dc.description.abstractthe preceding one (S1) presented outside the cRF and the following one (S2) presented inside the cRF with a stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of 50 or 100ms. The S1 stimulus appeared at either flanking sides of the cRF before the S2, thus making two directions of stimulus sequence. And this was compared with local directional preference that we measured with a Gabor stimulus confined within the cRF that drifted along two directions orthogonal to preferred orientation.
Although the S1 alone did not evoke spiking responses, the response to the S2 was significantly modulated by the S1, consistent with the previous study (Kim et al., 2012). The magnitude of modulation was asymmetrical between the two sequence directions, indicating that the cells showed a direction preference for apparent motion consisting of S1 and S2 that extended beyond the cRF. There was a significant positive relationship between global and local directional preferences, suggesting that V1 neurons tend to prefer the global motion direction that matched with their local directional preference. This positive correlation was significant for SOA of 50ms, but not for 100ms. These results suggest that V1 neurons participate in processing global motion based on surround interaction that is fine tuned for spatial and temporal relations between center and surround stimuli.
-
dc.description.tableofcontents1. Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1

2. Method -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5

2.1. Subjects ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5
2.1.1. Surgical procedures -----------------------------------------------------------------5
2.1.2. Behavioral training: Fixation and saccade tasks --------------------------------6
2.1.3. Craniotomy and dura cleaning ----------------------------------------------------7
2.2. Experiment environment ----------------------------------------------------------------8
2.2.1. Computer system --------------------------------------------------------------------8
2.2.2. Stimuli ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------9
2.3. Measuring eye signal --------------------------------------------------------------------11
2.4. Measuring neural signal -----------------------------------------------------------------12
2.4.1. Electrophysiological procedures --------------------------------------------------12
2.4.2. Extracting Spikes -------------------------------------------------------------------13
2.4.3. Sorting Spikes -----------------------------------------------------------------------14
2.4.4. Confirming the single-unit classification ----------------------------------------16
2.4.5. Spike density function --------------------------------------------------------------17
2.4.6. Eliminating outliers -----------------------------------------------------------------18
2.5. Methods of data analysis ----------------------------------------------------------------23
2.5.1. Direction selectivity ----------------------------------------------------------------23
2.6. Experiment procedures ------------------------------------------------------------------25
2.6.1. Receptive field mapping -----------------------------------------------------------25
2.6.2. Main experiment --------------------------------------------------------------------27


3. Result ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------30

3.1. Data summary -----------------------------------------------------------------------------30
3.2. Classification of simple and complex cell ---------------------------------------------34
3.2.1. Criterion of Simple and complex cells ---------------------------------------------34
3.2.2. Response pattern to different spatial and temporal frequencies ----------------36
3.3. Local and global directionalities --------------------------------------------------------39
3.3.1. Representative cell implying positive relationship ------------------------------39
3.3.2. Representative cell showing the effect of surround is differed by the SOAs--44
3.3.3. Correlation analysis ------------------------------------------------------------------46
3.4. Surround modulation index -------------------------------------------------------------49
3.5. Speed of local and global motion -------------------------------------------------------50
3.6. Local directionality index measuring by F1 component -----------------------------52
3.7. Eccentricities and cortical distances of surround stimuli ----------------------------53

4. Discussion ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------57

4.1. Global directionality ---------------------------------------------------------------------57
4.2. Sequential stimuli as a global motion stimulus ---------------------------------------58
4.3. Analysis period for calculating the mean response ----------------------------------59
4.4. Low proportion of simple cell & directional cell ------------------------------------59
4.5. Implications for motion processing ----------------------------------------------------60

References -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------62

Abstract in Korean ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------68
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1989761 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectsurround interaction-
dc.subjectreceptive field-
dc.subjectV1-
dc.subjectglobal motion-
dc.subjectdirectionality-
dc.subjectaperture problem-
dc.subject.ddc150-
dc.titleSpecificity of surround interaction for global motion directionality in awake monkey V1-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.citation.pagesvii, 70-
dc.contributor.affiliation사회과학대학 심리학과-
dc.date.awarded2014-02-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share